Moon of Shanghai, May 10, 2020
There appears to
be no shortage of claims from multiple informed and independent sources that
the WHO has two primary functions, the first as a tool for world population
reduction on behalf of its masters, and the second as a powerful marketing
agent for big pharma, specifically the vaccine manufacturers. Many critics have
pointed out that the 'vaccination experts' at the WHO are "dominated by
the vaccine makers standing to gain from the enormously lucrative vaccine and
antiviral contracts awarded by governments." And indeed, the advisory and
other committees involved with the WHO's vaccine programs seem heavily
populated with those who profit directly from those same programs.
Equally, the
claims and concerns about population control and reduction are far from
conspiracy theories today, with far too much evidence, some of it frightening,
that this is indeed a major agenda of the WHO today. We have already seen too
much hard evidence of this body's involvement in both areas to justify
dismissing the concerns as implausible fears. Moreover, there is a disturbing
list of individuals closely associated with the WHO, who have had either
population reduction or mass vaccinations as a pet project; individuals like
David Rothschild, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Bill Gates,
and many more, the list including national organisations like the CDC, FEMA,
the US Department of Homeland Security, the Rockefeller and Carnegie
Institutes, the CFR, and others.
It is not
difficult, on the basis of all the evidence, to conclude the WHO is an
international criminal enterprise under the control of a core group, one with
European corporate dynasties at its center which, as one writer noted,
"provides the strategic leadership and funds the development, manufacturing
and release of synthetic, man-made viruses solely to justify immensely
profitable mass vaccinations". We have seen so many instances of an
unusual and apparently laboratory-made virus appearing without warning, the
onset followed immediately by urgent worried pronouncements from the WHO of yet
another mandatory mass vaccination.
We have the
rampant production of deadly viruses in secretive labs around the world, and
the repeated "accidental" release of those into various populations
(think ZIKA) - seemingly inevitably without explanation, apology or even a
semblance of actual investigation, much less censure or criminal or civil
charges. We also have the blanket legal immunity for all pharma companies in
their creation and dissemination of deadly pathogens by vaccination. When we
add into this mix the WHO's history of criminality as with their now-famous
tetanus/hCG international sterility program, the curious timing of the onset of
AIDS, and the many occurrences of the WHO's vaccination programs perfectly
coinciding with a sudden outbreak of yet another unusual disease in the same
areas and populations, one would have to be a hard-core ideologue to not become
damned suspicious.
During the early
1990s, the WHO had been overseeing massive tetanus vaccination campaigns in
Nicaragua, Mexico, the Philippines, Tanzania and Nigeria. All tell a similar
story, one that almost beggars belief but with the facts too clear to refute.
Tetanus is a disease whose onset we often associate with stepping on a rusty
nail or some such event. It should be clear that men would be at least as
likely, if not more likely, to encounter this circumstance than would women,
and perhaps careless children more than adults, but the WHO vaccination program
was directed only to females from 15 to 45 years of age - in other words,
child-bearing ages. In Nicaragua, the targets were females from 12 to 49 years
of age.
Also, a single
tetanus shot is universally accepted as sufficient to provide protective
duration of ten years or more, but the WHO inexplicably insisted on vaccinating
these women five times within several months. Shortly after the initiation of
these programs, concerns began to emerge about spontaneous abortions and other
complications arising exclusively within the vaccinated populations. On
suspicion, a group in Mexico had the vaccination serum analysed and discovered
it contained the Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone. This hormone is
critical to the female body during pregnancy. It causes the release of other
hormones that prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilised
egg. Without it, a woman's body is unable to sustain a pregnancy and the fetus
will be aborted. This hormone was injected into the subjects along with the
tetanus serum, causing a female body to then recognise both as foreign agents
and to develop antibodies to destroy either if they were to ever appear in the
body in the future.
Upon becoming
pregnant, a woman's body would fail to recognize hCG as a friend and would
produce anti-hCG antibodies, the prior vaccination now inducing her body's
immune system to attack the hormone that is needed to bring an unborn child to
term, preventing subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which is necessary to
sustain them. This means each woman who received the WHO inoculation was
vaccinated not only against tetanus but also against pregnancy. (1) (2)
The WHO at first
denied the facts and disparaged the results of the initial tests, but following
this revelation each nation conducted extensive tests and in all cases the hCG
hormone was identified as existing in the tetanus vaccination serum. The WHO
eventually went silent and discontinued their program but by this time many
millions of women had been vaccinated - and rendered sterile. One important
fact is that the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used in this
project were developed, produced, and distributed in secrecy and that none had
ever been tested or licensed for sale or distribution anywhere in the world.
The companies that produced them were Connaught Laboratories and Intervex from
Canada, and Australia's CSL Laboratories. Connaught is the same firm that,
along with the Canadian Red Cross, knowingly distributed AIDS-contaminated
blood products for several years during the 1980s, a criminal organisation that
should have been executed along with its owners. (3)
Further damning
evidence that the Western media censored, was the fact that the WHO had been
actively involved for more than 20 years prior in the development of an
anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -
precisely the same combination as in these vaccines. According to the WHO's own
reports, they had spent nearly $400 million on this kind of "reproductive
health" research. More than 20 research articles have been written on this
subject, many of these by the WHO itself, that document in detail the WHO's
attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid. And they
aren't alone; the UNFPA, the UNDP, the World Bank and of course - whenever we
encounter secret efforts at population control - the ubiquitous Rockefeller
Foundation, are all allied in this cause, as was the US National Institute of
Health. The Government of Norway was also a partner in this travesty,
contributing more than $40 million to develop this Tetanus-abortion vaccine.
The Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation has been heavily funding the distribution of tetanus
vaccine in Africa by UNICEF, which is the agency that provided Kenya with the
vaccine laced with hCG. Gates said: "The world today has 6.8 billion
people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great
job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower
that by perhaps ten or fifteen percent." (4) The Rockefeller Foundation
also heavily funded this vaccine research and distribution. (5) All this
amounts to genocide on a planetary scale.
I examined in
detail the WHO website and discovered there were dozens of articles, many
written by WHO researchers, documenting in detail the WHO's attempts to create
an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. (6) Some
leading articles included:
•"Clinical
profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,"
Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268.
•"Observations
on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine:
B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,"
Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.
•"Phase 1
Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine," The
Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298. "Vaccines for Fertility
Regulation," Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction,
Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and
Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988).
•"Anti-hCG
Vaccines are in Clinical Trials," Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol.
36, 1992, pp. 123-126.
As early as 1978,
the WHO was actively exploring ways to eradicate much of the population of the
Third World. A paper published by the WHO (7) was titled, "Evaluating ...
placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation"; The paper
acknowledged "substantial progress" in its worldwide eugenics program
of culling non-whites, but yet identified "an urgent need for a greater
variety of methods" of preventing fertility, and gushed over the fact that
"immunisation as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted",
that the employment of sterilisation vaccines would be widely appealing (to
those dispensing the vaccines) and would offer "great ease of
delivery".
If that isn't
clear, the WHO is saying that vaccinations for other purposes - protection
against diseases - are so common and widely-accepted, inoculation is probably
the easiest way to sterilise the populations of undeveloped countries. The
paper then notes the accumulation of evidence that "there exist proteins
specific to the reproductive system" which "could be blocked" by
vaccinations and provide a new method of "fertility regulation".
Among the stated advantages of a sterilisation vaccine is that it could prevent
or disrupt implantation of the fertilised egg onto the uterus wall, and thereby
guarantee that every (non-white) conception would result in a miscarriage or
spontaneous abortion, i.e., an anti-hCG vaccine. The paper continues:
"Testing ...
will reveal whether a single injection is sufficient to achieve the desired
level of immunization, or whether several boosting injections will be required.
The main desired effect is to achieve a degree of immunization sufficient to:
(a) neutralize the hormonal activity of hCG in vivo; and (b) prevent or disrupt
implantation at a very early stage of pregnancy. It is not yet established
whether immunization with the β
hCG peptide conjugate will cause an irreversible biological neutralization of
hCG ... This will probably vary from individual to individual. In the first
case, the indication for immunization will be restricted to sterilization,
whereas in the second eventuality ... immunization may be considered as a
long-lasting but reversible anti-fertility measure."
On August 17-18,
1992, the WHO produced a report titled "Fertility Regulating
Vaccines", resulting from a large meeting in Geneva of scientists and
'womens' health advocates' "to review the current status of the
development of fertility regulating vaccines." The meeting was from a
joint Special Program of research in reproduction of the UNDP, UNFPA, the WHO
and the World Bank. The report stated, "... applied research on FRV's
(fertility-regulating vaccines) has been going on for more than twenty years
...", and discussed not only the anti-hCG vaccines already receiving
clinical trials, but the development of other vaccines such as an anti-GnRH
vaccine that would extend the temporary infertility due to breast-feeding.
This vaccine was
also being field-tested at the time, with the possible intention of employing
both antigens in the same vaccine on the assumption that a single vaccine might
not sterilise all victims. They also recognised the dangers of administering
such a vaccine to women who were already pregnant, and expressed awareness the
antibodies would almost certainly be present in the milk and might therefore
render the infants permanently sterile as well - with the massive
understatement that this "might not be acceptable to all potential users
..." From the outset, WHO planners realised that during mass vaccinations,
many pregnant women would also be inoculated with the anti-hCG serum, which
would inevitably result not only in sterilisation, miscarriages and spontaneous
abortions but also incurable autoimmune disorders and birth defects.
The same paper
went on to state, "In addition to women being immunized inadvertently
during an established pregnancy, fetuses could be exposed to potential
teratological effects of immunization ...". In other words, WHO staff
would freely inoculate pregnant women, those embryos or fetuses not
spontaneously aborting would experience pathological growth from which would
result various undefined birth defects. The WHO is not researching
'reproductive health', but reproductive impossibility, and their tetanus-hCG vaccine
is not in any sense 'regulating' the fertility of women but rendering their
fertility biologically impossible, which is not quite the same thing. Their own
paper stated the vaccination likely "will cause an irreversible biological
neutralization of hCG", which means the permanent sterilisation of
innocent women who agreed to receive tetanus shots.
Try to understand
what this means: the WHO was for decades receiving hundreds of millions of
dollars in funding for research and testing, to produce an antifertility
vaccine that would make a woman's immune system attack and destroy her own
babies in the womb, a vaccine they would surreptitiously combine with a tetanus
vaccination without informing the victims. To say their deceit was successful
would be an understatement. The WHO inoculated more than 130 million women in
52 countries with this vaccine, permanently sterilising some very large
percentage of them without their knowledge or consent. It was only when an
enormous number of women in all countries experienced vaginal bleeding and
miscarriages immediately after the vaccinations, that the hormone additive was
discovered as the cause. Suspicions were aroused when the WHO selected only
females of child-bearing age and further specified the unheard-of practice of
five multiple injections over a three month period, but the health officials in
these undeveloped countries still had faith in the white man's medicine.
Upon the discovery
of the hormone in the vaccine, Nigerian physicians reported WHO doctors telling
them the hCG hormone "would have no effect on human reproduction",
statements they knew to be false. When this information reached the public, the
WHO assumed an offensive and repugnant stand, mocking and ridiculing the
nations that had performed the tests and revealed the contamination, condemning
them as incompetent, having "unsuitable" testing laboratories, and
using improper samples or procedures. WHO officials claimed these nations had
"Not the right kind of lab to do the test. The labs know only how to test
urine samples . . ." This is the standard response by Western agencies,
governments, and corporations, when caught with adulterated products. When
Coca-Cola's drinks in China were found to contain frightening levels of
pesticides and chlorine, the immediate accusation was that China's biological
laboratories were all incompetent. When Nestle's noodles in India were found to
contain dangerously toxic amounts of lead, India's laboratories were all
incompetent. The next step is to carefully produce a few samples known to be
uncontaminated, provide them to an "independent" laboratory that
inevitably pronounces them clean, then move the story off the front page.
When the discovery
was made, many nations enacted immediate legal restraining orders against WHO
and UNICEF vaccine programs. WHO and UNICEF officials said the "grave
allegations" were "not backed up by evidence", which was
nonsense. UNICEF, USAID and the WHO refused to address the evidence like
vaginal bleeding, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions. They also refused to
discuss the reasons for a series of five closely-spaced vaccinations when one
had always been sufficient, ignoring the content of their own published papers
stating that multiple injections of a tetanus-hCG vaccine would be necessary
for effective sterilisation.
When faced with
documented results, WHO officials admitted the hormone did indeed exist
"in small amounts" in "some" of the vaccine material, but
that this was an inconsequential result of "accidental contamination".
Nobody at the WHO attempted to explain the source of the hCG hormone in
sufficient volume to contaminate 130 million doses of a vaccine, nor how that
"contamination" could "accidentally" have inserted itself
into all those vaccines. The Lancet reported that the US National Institute of
Health supplied much of the hCG hormone for WHO experiments and testing. The
Western media were of course too busy at the time telling us how evil Iran was,
to notice the small issue of 130 million women having been deliberately
vaccinated against pregnancy, without their knowledge. As I've often mentioned
elsewhere, the Western media are excessively fond of demonising Hitler, but
Hitler didn't sterilise 130 million women without their knowledge or consent,
so where is the moral outrage against the WHO? The outrage is buried in the
fact that none of those 130 million sterilised women were white.
The WHO went
silent for a while, but in 2015, Vatican Radio charged that the UN
organisations WHO and UNICEF were again executing vast international programs
of depopulating the earth by using vaccines to surreptitiously sterilise women
in Third World countries, this time in Kenya. It stated that "Catholic
Bishops in Kenya have been opposed to the nationwide Tetanus Vaccination Campaign
targeting 2.3 million Kenyan women and girls of reproductive age between 15-49
years, terming the campaign a secret government plan to sterilize women and
control population growth". (8) In May of 2018, it was reported that
fertility-regulating vaccines were being used in India. (9)
And Polio, Too
In 2009, there was
a spreading outbreak of Polio in Nigeria, a direct result of yet another WHO
vaccination program, this time directly linked to the vaccine which was made
from a live polio virus which always carries a risk of causing polio instead of
protecting against it - as the Americans learned to their chagrin many years
ago. Today in the West, polio vaccines are made from a killed virus that cannot
cause polio. This latest WHO-sponsored outbreak actually began several years
prior, which the WHO blamed on the live virus in their vaccines that had
somehow "mutated". So once again, the WHO is causing polio in the
undeveloped world, amid evidence that for every case of identified polio there
are hundreds of other children who don't develop the disease but remain
carriers and pass it on to others. It has long been recognised that the live
oral vaccine used by the WHO can easily cause the very epidemics it pretends to
be eliminating, and of course there is no published evidence that the polio
virus had in fact "mutated". The same occurred in Kenya, this time
using the hCG hormone tied to polio vaccinations, with the same tragic results.
(10)
In late 2013,
Syria experienced a sudden outbreak of polio, the first in that country in
about 20 years, and in an area that had been under the control of US-backed
revolutionary mercenaries. The Syrian government claimed to have evidence that
these foreigners brought the disease into the country from Pakistan, from
Western (US) agencies. The WHO was active in Pakistan in yet another of its
"humanitarian vaccination programs" that strangely coincided in
geographic area with a severe outbreak of polio, and Syrian authorities were
adamant that the West transmitted it to their nation when 1.7 million doses of
polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that no cases of
polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program started,
cases of polio began to reappear in Syria.
UNICEF began a
similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine
in the Philippines in spite of the fact there were no reported cases of polio
in the Philippines since 1993. This would fit the pattern from other instances
of sudden disease emergencies. I have not managed yet to reconstruct the WHO's
vaccination and other programs in all locations, but sudden outbreaks of
viruses are always suspicious since they cannot be created from nothing and
must be introduced into a population, and with surprising regularity appear on
the heels of some WHO vaccination program. The sudden and inexplicable
appearance of the Bubonic plague in Peru and Madagascar are two such events
and, increasingly often, the pathogens do not appear to be natural in origin.
In particular, the SARS-related camel virus in the Middle East had some obvious
signs of human engineering as did the SARS coronavirus itself. There are many
other such cases which are far too often linked with the presence of some
program of the WHO.
The WHO is also
becoming active in China with alarming potential for disaster. As one example,
in late 2013, a number of newborn Chinese babies died immediately after being
inoculated by the WHO against hepatitis B. The WHO China representative, Dr.
Bernhard Schwartlander, called China's program "very successful", but
I find myself with knawing suspicions about his definition of 'success'. The
infant deaths may indeed have been an unfortunate accident, but I was not
encouraged by Schwartlander's comment that it is "difficult to establish a
causal link between the vaccines and the babies' deaths". Knowing the past
history of the WHO and their infectious inoculations, the 'difficulty of
establishing a causal link between the WHO vaccinations and civilian deaths',
may have been the part that was 'successful'.
Pfizer Case Study - The Perfectly-Timed Epidemic
It is by now
well-known that many new drugs are accompanied by serious side-effects such as
irreversible liver damage, and are often fatal to children. In 1996 Pfizer
developed a new antibiotic called Trovan to treat a variety of infections -
meningitis being one example. Many of these new antibiotics are very powerful
and with side effects that normally make them too dangerous to use for
children, often causing permanent liver damage, joint disease and many other debilitating
complications. Inexplicably, Pfizer decided to perform test trials on infants.
However, Pfizer had the standard problem that FDA certification in the US
required clinical trials on humans, and these are almost impossible to conduct
in developed countries because no parents are willing to allow their children
to take part in such risky clinical trials, to say nothing of the lawsuits
resulting from trials gone bad. Therefore these pharma companies tend almost
universally to take their trials to poor countries in Africa, Asia and South
America where the laws are unprepared and the people don't understand the risks
of untested and unapproved drugs. The American (and European) pharma companies
therefore transformed the developing world into an enormous test laboratory
that carries no financial liability.
As luck would have
it, at precisely the moment when Pfizer was ready to commence clinical trials
of this new drug, Nigeria was suddenly and inexplicably hit with one of the
worst meningitis epidemics in history. And of course, Pfizer was there to help
the Nigerian government deal with the outbreak. But Pfizer didn't exactly deal
with the outbreak; what it did was to conduct a reprehensible clinical trial
for its new medication, on a group of victims unlikely to complain. Rather than
"helping" as it claimed, Pfizer gathered a trial group and a control
group, giving one group Pfizer's new medication and a competitor's product to
the other. It quickly became obvious that the Americans were not on a humanitarian
mission but were saving the expense of live trials. After experimenting on
about 200 victims, they gathered their test information and left - right in the
middle of the meningitis epidemic, without having saved any lives. The Nigerian
government tallied the deaths at about 11,000.
That would have
been the end, except that a controversy erupted soon after about the
relationship between Pfizer's need for test trials and the meningitis outbreak.
As it happened, the WHO was in Nigeria immediately prior to that time on
another of its "life-saving" vaccination programs, this time for
polio, and the timing and location of the meningitis outbreak apparently
matched perfectly the WHO's polio vaccination program. And of course it
perfectly matched Pfizer's need for large numbers of test subjects. There were
lawsuits and payments, accusations and denials, but to this day Nigeria refuses
WHO entry into the country and will not participate in any further
"humanitarian" aid from the UN or the WHO. We cannot definitively say
that the WHO deliberately created the meningitis epidemic for the benefit of
Pfizer's tests, but it's the only theory that fits all the known facts and it's
the kind of thing the WHO appears to do on a regular basis. We should note
Pfizer's intention to market Trovan in the US and Europe after its trials on
these African children, but the FDA refused to approve Trovan for American
children due to the severe dangers.
Pfizer's behavior
after these "field trials" ended was, if anything, even more reprehensible.
The lawsuits were based on claims that Pfizer did not have proper consent from
parents to use an experimental drug on their children, the use of which not
only left many children dead but others with brain damage, paralysis or slurred
speech. Pfizer eventually reached a settlement with the Nigerian state
government to pay $75m in damages and to create a fund of $35m to compensate
the victims. This, after what the Guardian described as "a 15-year legal
battle against Pfizer over a fiercely controversial drug trial". Pfizer
not only resisted to the end, forcing the poor families through 15 years of
hell before finally relenting, but resorted to extortion and blackmail of
Nigerian government officials in attempts to avoid making any payments to the families
of the tiny victims of its illegal drug trial. The UK Guardian reported that
leaked US government diplomatic cables revealed that "Pfizer hired
investigators to look for evidence of corruption against the Nigerian attorney
general in an effort to persuade him to drop the legal action", with the
apparent full knowledge and possibly assistance of the US State Department.
The Guardian
stated the diplomatic cables recorded meetings between Pfizer's country
manager, Enrico Liggeri, and US officials at the Abuja embassy on 9 April 2009,
stating, "According to Liggeri, Pfizer had hired investigators to uncover
corruption links to federal attorney general Michael Aondoakaa to expose him
and put pressure on him to drop the federal cases. He said Pfizer's investigators
were passing this information to local media." The Guardian also reported
there was no suggestion or evidence Nigeria's attorney general was swayed by
this pressure. Pfizer of course claimed the entire notion was
"preposterous", but we can assume the cables - which were classified
as "Confidential" - didn't lie.
It seems Pfizer
was dissembling in all its statements, not only with claims of government
approval and parental knowledge, but their claim a Nigerian doctor was in
charge and directed the experiments. The government's study found the local
doctor was the director "in name only" and most often was not even
informed of the procedures of the study and was typically "kept in the
dark". As well Pfizer used the fake letter from a non-existent department
to obtain FDA approval for these clinical trials. Pfizer finally admitted the
forged letter was "incorrect", but I'm not sure that is the most
appropriate adjective to use. Pfizer also made the infuriatingly dishonest
claim that its antibiotic "Trovan demonstrated the highest survival rate
of any treatment at the hospital. Trovan unquestionably saved lives."
Well, maybe, but the data on which Pfizer based this claim were the fact that
in one location five patients died after using Pfizer's drug while six patients
died after using another medication, with no data as to infection severity or
anything else. At best, an empty and fundamentally dishonest claim.
To deflect the
issue of Pfizer's Trovan being lethal to children, the company claimed that the
international body Doctors Without Borders (Médecins sans Frontières) were
administering Pfizer's drug in their own large treatment program, a claim MSF
vehemently denied, saying, "We have never worked with this family of
antibiotic. We don't use it for meningitis. That is the reason why we were
shocked to see this trial in the hospital." It was Pfizer's Liggeri who
claimed the lawsuits against Pfizer "were wholly political in
nature", and Liggeri as well who concocted the accusation that MSF had
administered Pfizer's Trovan to children.
In 2006 the
Washington Post reported on a lengthy Nigerian government study that concluded
Pfizer violated international law by testing its unapproved drug on children
with brain infections. The Post apparently obtained a copy of the confidential
report which had been hidden away for five years, and which stated Pfizer had
never received authorisation from the government for its clinical trial, the
apparent authorisation letter having been forged on the letterhead of a non-existent
department and backdated to a date prior to the study. According to the Post's
article, the government claimed Pfizer's 'humanitarian effort' was "an
illegal trial of an unregistered drug, and a clear case of exploitation of the
ignorant." (11)
The American
response was not one of shame for participating in this fraud, nor did the
State Department condemn Pfizer for either conducting the drug trials or
attempting the extortion and blackmail. Instead, the US ambassador condemned
the leak of US embassy cables, as if publicly revealing the crime constituted a
worse action than the crime itself. The State Department rushed the high moral
ground to condemn "endangering innocent people" and "sabotaging
peaceful relations between nations", ignoring the facts that Pfizer's
trials did far more to 'endanger innocent people' and 'sabotage relations' than
could be done by the revelation of a crime. But in the eyes of the US
government, Americans do not commit crimes, and in any case the victims weren't
white. The cables further claimed Pfizer settled only because legal and
'investigative' fees had been costing the company more than $15 million per
year, which leads one to wonder what occurs in the minds of these people who
will spend $15 million a year for 15 years, to avoid paying half that sum to
compensate lives they destroyed.
And there is still
more. We have seen so many documented examples of the US courts assuming
jurisdiction where they have none, agreeing to try cases without any US
involvement that occurred wholly outside the US, in flagrant violations of
international law, and indicative only of imperial arrogance. But when Nigeria
attempted to file claims against Pfizer in the US, the American courts refused
to hear the cases, oddly claiming they had no jurisdiction. And this isn't the
first time the US government, the State Department and the US courts have
circled the wagons to protect a US multinational by closing the courts.
In 2004 and 2007,
the Nigerian media carried reports which were heavily suppressed in US and
Western media that the country was refusing to permit UN health authorities to
carry out further administration of polio vaccines, blaming the WHO for having
initiated the meningitis epidemic in 1996 that resulted in Pfizer's highly
questionable drug trial in that country. Nigerian leaders were also concerned
that polio and other foreign vaccines were deliberately contaminated with
sterilising and other agents, as occurred in the Philippines and other nations
at around the same time. In much of Africa, there appears to be little
remaining of the trust that once existed in international agencies and US and
European pharma companies. Today, they are viewed primarily as imperial
predators with a distinctly anti-human agenda, or at least an agenda that is
anti non-white. The portions of Nigeria and other African nations that do still
permit vaccinations now insist these be prepared in a trusted non-Western
country with no involvement of the WHO or other Western agencies.
Many nations today
insist the WHO is a tool to reduce Muslim populations, a claim that is increasingly
difficult to dismiss as simple paranoia, and in fact Nigeria also discovered
sterilants in WHO vaccines in that country that were clearly capable of
lowering fertility in women. The Western media steadfastly ignore the body of
evidence supporting these claims and suspicions, and focus instead on a
moralistic concern that "the world might be slipping in its efforts to
wipe out polio", categorising the valid concerns of so many nations as
ignorant and uninformed suspicion. The Western media of course are all reading
from the same page as the perpetrators of this outrage.
We also have the
ever-present corporate apologists, weaving their tapestries of misinformation
attempting to irreversibly confuse an issue with irrelevancies and so as to
place doubts in the minds of the public. One perennial favorite is a claim that
"these attacks on pharmaceutical companies could encourage countries to
enact legislation that would lower drug profits, which in turn could hamper the
development of new medications". This foolish statement from Roger Bate, a
"fellow" at the International Policy Network, which is a lobby group
for big pharma, funded by the usual Foundations and corporations, and dutifully
reported by London's Daily Telegraph in its campaign to confuse the uninformed
public. The statement is actually rather clever, suggesting that our
condemnation of the atrocities and illegalities of big pharma are somehow
unjustified violent "attacks" on undeserving corporations. In the
case of Pfizer and its Nigerian Trovan trials, The Telegraph gives us an added
incentive to sympathise with big pharma by telling us - without evidence or
documentation - that "the Nigerian government's motives (in condemning
Pfizer) have also been questioned", the issue being morphed from
reprehensible drug trials resulting in death of children into one of an
untrustworthy government with questionable political motives. Thus will the
Western media will spin and weave until truth in all its forms disappears from
the landscape forever.
*
Forward this
article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry
Romanoff is a retired management
consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in
international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export
business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University,
presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr.
Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books
generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent
contributor to Global Research.
Notes:
(1) Tetanus
vaccine laced with anti-fertility drug; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12346214
(2) HCG found in
WHO tetanus vaccine in Kenya; https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/hcg-found-in-who-tetanus-vaccine-in-kenya/
(3) Vaccines and
Population Control: A Hidden Agenda; https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/are-new-vaccines-laced-with-birth-control-drugs/
(4) Bill Gates and
the anti-fertility agent in African tetanus vaccine;
(5)
Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO; https://www.globalresearch.ca/rockefeller-funded-anti-fertility-vaccine-coordinated-by-who
(6) One need only
search the WHO website for hCG to find the reports.
(7) Clin. exp.
Immunol. (1978) 33, (360-375); February 8, 1978
(8) Vatican:
UNICEF and WHO are sterilizing girls through vaccines
(9)
Fertility-Regulating Vaccines are Being Tested in India; https://vactruth.com/2018/05/30/fertility-regulating-vaccines-india/
(10) Polio
Vaccines Laced with Sterilizing Hormone Discovered in Kenya – WHO is
Controlling Population?
(11) Panel Faults
Pfizer in '96 Clinical Trial In Nigeria; www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601338.html
(12) Drugs
companies fund patient groups which attack NHS; https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/3112841/Drugs-companies-fund-patient-groups-which-attack-NHS-decisions.html
The original
source of this article is Moon of Shanghai
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, 2020
