LARRY ROMANOFF • AUGUST 8, 2020
First,
let’s dispel the combined notion that China spies on everyone and the US spies
on no one. There is so much public evidence to destroy both these assertions
that I won’t bother repeating them here. I will however remind readers that a
few years ago China more or less banned Windows 8 from the country because it
was discovered that the O/S had a built-in NSA back door.[1] It
seems that Germany reported on this first, but the devastating proof was at an
IT conference where a Microsoft executive was interrupted during a speech with
precisely this accusation..[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] He
did not deny it because the person making the accusation was the person who
discovered it and had with him the proof, but refused to discuss it and changed
the subject.
But
this is hardly news. Forty years ago it was proven that all Xerox copy machines
delivered to foreign embassies and consulates in the US were “espionage-ready”[10][11] Also,
for at least 20 years, and perhaps much more, it was common knowledge that when
any foreign embassies, consulates, banks and other corporations ordered
computers and similar hardware from US suppliers, those shipments were
intercepted by UPS, delivered to the CIA and/or NSA for installation of “extra”
hardware and software before delivery to their destinations. This was one of
the confirmations by Edward Snowden.[12][13][14][15] Any
search on this will give you millions of hits unless Google chooses that moment
to lose its memory.
Huawei
Trump’s
problems with Huawei are twofold. The most obvious is that China is eating
America’s lunch when it comes to innovation and invention and Trump would like
to slow this down by destroying Huawei and is clearly making every possible
effort in this regard, including bullying and threatening half the known world
against using Huawei’s products. But this is the small part of the problem; the
real issue is espionage. There is no practical value in disputing the assertion
that Cisco and other American hardware and software firms install back doors to
all their equipment for the convenience of CIA and NSA access. But suddenly
Huawei is replacing Cisco and those other American firms with its better and
less expensive equipment.
That
part is okay, but how can the CIA and NSA approach Huawei and ask the company
to build back doors into its equipment so the US can spy on China – among all
other countries? There is no solution to this problem other than to trash
Huawei’s reputation by accusing it of being an espionage threat and having the
company’s equipment banned. And this applies not only to the US, but to the
entire Five Eyes Espionage Network, involving the US, Canada, the UK, Australia
and New Zealand. [16]Briefly,
this was set up to break laws while pretending no laws were being broken. It is
generally against the law for a government to spy on its own citizens, but that
law doesn’t apply to a foreign government. So Canada spies on Australian
citizens and sends the information to the Australian spooks who can claim they
did nothing wrong. Rinse and repeat. The sad part is that the “intelligence”
received is usually of little interest to the four minor participants but all of
it is shared with the US who are frothing to spy on the entire world and to
take possession of “every communication” of every kind in the entire world.
Thus, it isn’t sufficient to ban Huawei only from the US because this company’s
equipment would castrate the NSA’s effort in the other four nations. Thus, US
bullying to ensure each of its five eyes is Huawei-free. And that’s the entire
story, like it or not.
Tik-Tok
Tik-Tok
is nothing of consequence, except that it is in direct competition with similar
American platforms and has proven too popular and too competitive to be
permitted to survive. This is just a cheap, below-the-belt and illegal-as-hell
shot at China. No threat, no nothing. However, as with all similar IT products
and platforms it contains much personal information especially useful for
marketing, which has so far been the private property of people like Google,
Facebook and Twitter. Thus, Trump kills two birds with one stone: either simply
kill Tik-Tok on some trumped-up accusation (if you’ll excuse the expression) of
espionage, or force a sale to an American company. Either way, China loses
massively while the political oppression and marketing value of that personal
information remains safely in trusted American hands.
WeChat
Since
few Americans are familiar with WeChat, let me give you a description. Many of
these functions are available in the West through various platforms, but not
always to the same extent nor with the same convenience.
With
WeChat we can transmit text and voice messages, photos and videos, and other
files of any description even of many Mb in size. We can send and receive both
text and voice messages in any language because WeChat has an excellent
translation function in combination with one of its partners which translates
not only text and voice, but will extract and translate all text contained in
photos, handy for restaurant menus if you can’t read Chinese. We can place not
only voice calls but video calls to anyone anywhere that transmit over the
internet. It is so convenient that WeChat is the default communication choice
for a great many people for most purposes. WeChat also has a Moments platform
where we can post text, photos, videos, that are visible to those on our
contact lists while selecting those who can view and who cannot, reserving some
posts for close friends and others more generally public.
In
China we have two primary online payment systems, one operated by Alibaba
(called Alipay) and the other by WeChat. Its use is nearly universal in China
and both are free to the user. During the past several years I cannot recall a
single instance where I had cash in my pocket (even small change) when I went
anywhere or was shopping for anything. Even to purchase a small bunch of green
onions at a street market, the vendor has a QR code which my phone scans and
the payment into their bank account is automatic.
With
WeChat, we can send money to each other. If we want to share the cost of lunch,
you can pay the entire bill and I transfer my share to you through WeChat. If I
ever need cash, I could go to any shop or even approach a complete stranger and
ask for 1,000 RMB and instantly repay him into his WeChat account. It is
frequently used to transfer money internationally this way, sending dollars to
a friend in one country and receiving RMB into a WeChat account in China.
Instant, secure, and free of all fees. It all happens within a second, with a
concurrent text message confirmation from the bank of both sides of the
transaction. WeChat is the main reason people can travel anywhere in China with
only a mobile phone and passport (and a change of clothing). Through WeChat,
people can purchase plane or train tickets, pay taxi fares and hotel bills,
restaurant tabs, in the same way.
Another
useful WeChat function is real-time GPS location sharing. If a group is
traveling to a destination in several cars, WeChat displays an active GPS map
showing all locations in real space and time. If I am meeting a friend at a
shopping mall or park or other large location, with this GPS function we can
see each other’s location in real time and I know which way to walk to
encounter my friend.
We
have WeChat groups which we can create with any number of participants for any
convenient purpose. During the COVID-19 lockdown in Shanghai we had a temporary
WeChat group for the purchase of meat and vegetables that functioned better
than any supermarket and with much less trouble. If I want to have a Christmas
party I form a group of those I plan to invite, and all our discussions and
planning take place within that platform. Most communities (small portions of
residential districts) have a WeChat group for notification of community events
and sharing important information.
The
point with Trump’s “sanction” of WeChat is first that it will terminally
disrupt international communications between China and the US for students,
scientists, diplomats, media reporters, for all those in the US who have
frequent communications with China, effects felt more seriously by those in
China, which is a plus for Trump. Second, Trump’s administration is
uncomfortable with the extent to which WeChat is encroaching on the American
turf of Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and more, with already around
100 million downloads in the US, and his actions are partially to reclaim that
turf by simply banning a competing medium that is threatening to take over and
seriously downgrade the popularity of similar American platforms.
But
most important is the espionage and censorship role of Trump’s initiative. As
the censorship noose tightens around Facebook and Twitter, Americans are
naturally moving to WeChat. The real issue is not that WeChat poses any danger
to the US in any sense but, as with Huawei, the CIA and NSA cannot very well
approach WeChat and ask for automatic sharing of all that personal relationship
data. Therefore, under the guise of China being untrustworthy, the US
government simply bans WeChat and thus no one in the US can send or receive any
message without the NSA having a copy. A huge plus is that any news not fitting
the official narrative will then be strangled at birth, as Google, Facebook and
Twitter are now doing. If Microsoft or another American firm were to buy
WeChat, then of course all is well since it is US firms, not Chinese, who
automatically share all personal contact data with their government.
Notes
[1] https://www.cnet.com/news/china-bans-windows-8-from-government-computers/
[2] https://www.rt.com/news/windows-8-nsa-germany-862/
[3] https://www.technobuffalo.com/nsa-windows-8-exploit
[4] https://wccftech.com/windows-nsa-backdoor-shadow-brokers/
[5] https://www.pcworld.com/article/2047332/is-windows-8-a-trojan-horse-for-the-nsa-the-german-government-thinks-so.html
[6] http://techrights.org/2013/06/15/nsa-and-microsoft/
[7] https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2019/11/12/windows-10-security-alert-hidden-backdoor-found-by-kaspersky-researchers/
[8] https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1160914-how-nsa-access-was-built-into-windows/
[9] http://techrights.org/2013/06/15/nsa-and-microsoft/
[10] http://electricalstrategies.com/about/in-the-news/spies-in-the-xerox-machine/
[11] https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/state-sponsored-commercial-espionage-the-global-theft-of-ideas/
[12] https://www.extremetech.com/computing/173721-the-nsa-regularly-intercepts-laptop-shipments-to-implant-malware-report-says
[13] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-nsa-intercepts-computer-deliveries/
[14] https://www.computerworld.com/article/2487222/the-nsa-intercepts-computer-deliveries-to-plant-spyware.html
[15] https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608141/snowden–the-nsa-planted-backdoors-in-cisco-products.html
[16] https://americanfreepress.net/five-eyes-network-sees-all/
*
Larry
Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior
executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an
international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at
Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs
to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing
a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be
contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
Copyright
© Larry
Romanoff, Moon of Shanghai,
2020
Posting: lv
