Benjamin Freedman and the ”dynamic
silence”
Traces of Freedman: New York Times
articles 1946-1965
1. Seven Masters of
Deception
2. Controlling Policies
of Mass Media
3. President Wilson
Blackmailed
4. Justice Brandeis -
The Pay Off
5. Lloyd George - A
Zionist Tool
6. Edward M. House -
Conspirator
7. Selecting America’s
Ally in WWI
8. Promoting Germans
Victory and Stabbing Them in the Back
9. Worldwide Zionist
Boycott against Nazi Germany
10. Franklin D. Roosevelt
Manipulated
11. US Secretary of Defense Makes
Startling Revelation
12. Conspirators Provoke Pearl
Harbor Incident
13. A Pressured Eisenhower and
Resolution 117
14. Eisenhower Fulfills the Zionist
Demands in Middle East
15. John F. Kennedy Pledges Zionists
16. John F. Kennedy Enlightened on
the Palestine Question
17. Neville Chamberlain and
Ambassador Kennedy Sr.
18. Lyndon B. Johnson and the
so-called Six Day War
19. Controlling the US Vote in the
United Nations
20. Rothschilds and the Suez Canal
21. Zionist Supervision Necessary to
Control Middle East Situation
22. Rothschild Interests and
”Chosen” Asiatic Jews
Additional:
Other material by Freedman
Related books
Timetable
Benjamin Harrison Freedman was born in 1890, and
became a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the
principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry at
the end of World War II, 1945. At least 2.5 million dollars was spent by Mr.
Freedman to educate people about what he himself called ”the Talmudic tyranny.”
Its stronghold was - and is - the United States of America. Mr. Freedman was
”an insider” at the highest levels of Jewish machinations. Freedman became
active in politics at an early age and became acquainted with many important
people, as Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin
Roosevelt, Joseph and his son John F. Kennedy. He personally interviewed at
length seven presidents of the United States.
Although raised as a Jew, the author became disgusted
with the chicanery of the Jews, and Judaism, and became an ardent Christian.
Arnold Forster, a high official of the Anti-Defamation
League of B’nai B’rith or ADL, in his 1988 autobiography Square One,
called Benjamin Freedman an affluent, apostate, self-hating Jew.
The magazine Commentary (published by
the American Jewish Committee) for February, 1955, referred to him as Jewish
anti-Semite Benjamin Freedman. This of course was only a way to
”neutralize” him in the eyes of other Jews who were blindly following their
leaders.
”This author has been in a position since 1912 to
witness what was going on behind the scenes. This author served on the National
Democratic Committee in the 1912 campaign that elected President Wilson to his
first term. No doors have been closed to this author since then. This author
was ushered into this world in 1890 by Dr. Simon Baruch, the father of Mr. Bernard
M. Baruch. Mr. Bernard Baruch was a good friend of this author’s family and
would very often consult this author on this situation.”
(Benjamin Freedman, from an extracted paragraph of this pamphlet)
”Benjamin H. Freedman... committed himself to finding
and telling the facts about Zionism and Communism, and encouraged others to do
the same. The son of one of the founders of the American Jewish
Committee, which for many years was anti-Zionist, Ben Freedman founded
the League for Peace with Justice in Palestine in 1946. He
gave me copies of materials on the Balfour Declaration which I
might never have found on my own and encouraged my own research. (He died in
April 1984.)”
(Robert John)
Benjamin Freedman and the ”dynamic
silence”
”I’ve read some of the interesting material published
by anti-Zionist jew, Benjamin Freedman. I only see it online, here. Checked
several university libraries, Lexus, Nexus, and Dialog, and still find nothing
else on Freedman. Even checked 50-75 y/o WHO’S WHO [in business, etc]. It’s
like the man never lived. His anti-Zionist, yet jewish manuscripts remind me
very much of presentday Israel Shahak. Both, understand that the
most repressive force to ever bear down on jews has always been rabbinical
totalitarianism. The [now heavily censored and difficult to find]
writings of Hannah Arendt demonstrate that the Zionists were
more than willing to collaborate with the Nazi’s - in essence because they both
are kindred spirits which is totalitarian.”
Female writer on alt.revisionism (1997/06/20)
Most persons reading this Internet posting should be
familiar with who Benjamin Harrison Freedman (23 Aug 1890 - Feb 1973) [1984
according to Robert John or IHR editor] was. He was a very prominent Boston and
New York businessman. Born an Eastern European ”jew” and very much involved in
viewing and participating in the jewish machinations against freedom and
traditional American values, Freedman was appalled to see all that his fellow
”jews” perpetrated against this country. As a consequence, Benjamin Freedman,
utterly separated himself from his former jewish associates.
When world jewry agitated to seize Palestine and to
form a ”Jewish State” in the Middle East, there was NO ONE more opposed
to this than Freedman. He was, then, one of the most prominent
Anti-Zionists which is all the more astounding because Ben had emerged from
that identical murky Talmudic network.
It is clear to this observer that the Ashkenazi
Eastern Europeans who call themselves ”jews” very much regarded Freedman as a
traitor and a great danger to their cabal. The very familiar marxist
tool of ”dynamic silence” was effectively put to use on Benjamin Freedman.
Try as hard as you might, you will find virtually NOTHING on the man in printed
volumes. He SHOULD be found in WHO’S WHO IN BUSINESS, in various biographies,
in numerous printed references. But, NO. It’s as if Benjamin Freedman never
even existed.
As an antidote to this post-mortem attempt by the same
khazaric ”jews” to destroy the memory of this great Anti-Zionist leader, I post
this listing of several newspaper items regarding Benjamin Freedman. The articles show that Ben did everything humanly
possible to derail the Un-American and anti-white but essentially Talmudic
forces which have shaped the America we now live in. Here then are a few
listings which show that Freedman was VERY influential, extremely well versed
in the schemes and machinations of Un-American jewry, and that he ”took no crap
off anybody” who might impugn his good name and best intentions for the Free
Society we all should cherish.
Male writer on alt.revisionism (1997/10/04)
Traces of Freedman: New York Times
articles 1946-1965
New York Times July 8, 1946 p 3 column 1
Officers and members of the executive committee of the AMERICAN JEWISH
COMMITTEE said that they are ready to answer a $5M suit filed against them by
Benjamin H. Freedman of the LEAGUE FOR PEACE WITH JUSTICE IN PALESTINE.
The suit stemming from a circular memo by the AJC which said that newspapers
ads in behalf of the JUSTICE LEAGUE were really representative of Freedman,
only.
New York Times May 3, 1948 p 20 column 2
Evidence introduced Mid-Manhattan Magistrates Court sought to link Benjamin H.
Freedman with ”the Grand Mufti” of Jerusalem and with the establishment of a
submachine gun factory in Pakistan.
New York Times May 5, 1948 p 35 column 7
Benjamin H. Freedman who says he has spent more than $100,000 of his own money
fighting Zionism charged that leading US Jews were the dictators of policy on
Palestine. Naming among others: Gov. Herbert H. Lehman, Bernard M. Baruch,
Samuel I. Rosenman, David K. Niles, Thomas J. Watson of IBM, and Edward M.M.
Warburg. Magistrate, Hyman Bushel, adjourned till tomorrow.
New York Times May 7, 1948 p 7 column 1
Under cross-examination from the Magistrate, Freedman stated that he was born
in the jewish faith but studied to be a Catholic. Magistrate Bushel countered,
”The jews put you out and the Catholics won’t have you.”
New York Times May 8, 1948 p 4 column 8
Benjamin H. Freedman testified that last winter he discussed partition [of
Palestine] at a dinner of 52 members of Congress and for which he paid the bill.
New York Times Dec 9, 1950 p 18 column 6
Anna M. Rosenberg confronted the man who accused her of Communist-front
affiliations, Robert de Sola, himself an admitted former Communist. She has
said the case was one ”of mistaken identity”. She had been nominated as Asst
Secretary of Defense, by Pres. Truman at the suggestion of Defense Secr.,
George C. Marshall.
New York Times Dec 12, 1950 p 41 column 2
Benjamin Freedman, NY businessman, testified in hearings against Anna M.
Rosenberg before the Senate Armed Services Committee. The session was
highlighted by the appearance of Sen. Richard Nixon, former member of the House
Un-American Activities Committee.
New York Times Dec 15, 1950 p 41 column 1
Benjamin Freedman first brought the Red charges against Anna M. Rosenberg to
the attention of the committee. Senators heard testimony today that Gerald L.K.
Smith was also consulted [by Freedman] that Rosenberg was once affiliated with
Communists. She has vigorously denied the charge.
New York Times Dec 17, 1950 p 24 column 3
Senate Armed Services Committee clears Rosenberg for Asst. Secr. of Defense
position.
New York Times Mar 22, 1952 p 30 column 1
Benjamin H. Freedman of 300 Central Park, NY, described by counsel as the
former owner of a cosmetic company [Woodbury’s] filed suit seeking $12M in
seven suits against 15 broadcasting companies and news commentators with the NY
State Supreme Court. William S. Paley and Charles Collingwood had agreed to a
settlement and opposed a merger of the suits. The suits were based on news
reports of Freedman’s testimony in Dec 1950 of his testimony before the Senate
Armed Services Committee.
New York Times Aug 20, 1965 p 8 column 3
Benjamin Harrison Freedman, retired businessman, urged Arthur J. Goldberg, US
Ambassador to UN, to prove his devotion to the rule of law by seeking a
reversal of American policies on Israel. Freedman declared that the
presence of Israel was due to a world Zionist plot involving the British. He
went on to say that the existence of a Jewish State in the Middle East could
provoke a world nuclear war.
Male
writer on alt.revisionism (1997/10/1. Seven Masters of Deception
 |
The names of Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F.Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon will certainly be found one day inscribed in big red letters in the official annals of the rise and fall of the United states. These seven masters of deception incurred their guilt by debasing their solemn oaths of office on behalf of undisclosed domestic and foreign principals without any apparent qualms or misgivings, to enhance their political fortunes totally oblivious of the threat to United States security and survival.
These seven masters of deception knowingly and
willingly in effect and in fact "poisoned the wells" of security and
survival for the United States. Without any evident scruples, they individually
betrayed the sacred traditions enshrined in the letter and spirit of their
oaths of office, that precious heritage bequeathed to each of these seven
masters of deception as successors to that high office exalted by the
immortalized first president of the United States, the venerated George
Washington.
The disclosures which follow here are now revealed for
the first time anywhere. They now expose for the first time to the grass roots
population of the United States the secret un-American, non-American and
anti-American strategy to which these seven masters of deception knowingly
subscribed. The uninhibited practice of that strategy by these seven masters of
deception is primarily responsible for desperate predicament in which the
United States today finds itself in the Middle East.
Very early in their political careers, these seven
masters of deception by their determination acquired their proficient skill in
detecting on which side their political bread was buttered. Their remarkable
perfection in that skill provides the answer to why these seven masters of
deception went so far and so fast in so few years in the political world in
which they moved.
Throughout their political careers these seven masters
of deception demonstrated that political shrewdness invariably identified with
the immoral dogma of 20th century politicians who preach and practice "any
means justifies all ends." Accordingly, future grass roots populations of
the United States will one day find inscribed in the history of the rise and
fall of the United States the verdict that the "means" today
advocated by these seven masters of deception were primarily responsible for
the "end" of the United States.
It is today a well recognized fact of life in
political circles in the United States that the censorship exercised today by
Zionists over the media for mass information constitutes a virtual monopoly. It
is likewise today a well recognized fact of life in political circles in the
United States since President Wilson won his first election in 1912 as
president of the United States, that elections in the United States are seldom
won or lost today based upon the candidates' qualification for office.
Elections in the United States since 1912 are won or lost on the battlefields
of the media for mass information by character assassination.
Zionist ownership of media for mass information, or by
Zionist control exercised by some devious corporate device in effect and in
fact censors the news and editorial policies of [such] as the leading daily and
Sunday newspapers, all the weekly and monthly news magazines, all leading radio
and television stations and networks, the entire motion picture industry, the
entire entertainment world and the entire book publishing industry, in effect
and in fact the entire complex of media for mass information in the United
States, truly a brainwashing monopoly.
2. Controlling Policies of Mass
Media
As a result of that condition in the United States,
for approximately the past fifty years the grass root population of the United
States has only read, heard and seen what passed Zionist censorship and best
served Zionist objectives, instead of reading, hearing and seeing what best
served the interests of the grass roots population of the United States. The
Zionist-ruled media for mass information in the United States never informed
the grass roots population of the United States how and why President Woodrow
Wilson lied the United States into the desperate predicament in which the
United States today finds itself in the Middle East.
In their consideration recently of the alleged theft
of the so-called PENTAGON PAPERS, the United States Supreme Court declared "the public has a right
to know the truth." The Supreme Court should have said "the public
has a right to know the WHOLE truth." The reason half-truths often are
more harmful than lies.
The United States declared war against Germany on
April 6, 1917. On April 2,1917 President Wilson addressed both houses of
Congress and pleaded with them to declare war against Germany. President
Wilson's appeal to Congress to declare war against Germany in effect and in
fact was primarily President Wilson's liquidation of his obligation to his
blackmailers. The following incontestible facts confirm that conclusion beyond
all question of any doubt. President Wilson's hand trembled as he read his
address. The members of Congress present had no reason to suspect why President
Wilson's hand trembled. By the time the grass roots population finish reading
this, they will know the reason President Wilson's hand trembled as he read his
message to Congress.
By the time President Wilson finished reading his
appeal to Congress, many of his listeners were in tears but not for the reason
the grass roots population of the United States today will be in tears when
they finish reading this manuscript. When President Wilson asked Congress to
declare war against Germany, President Wilson was in effect and in fact
conspiring to pay the debt he obligated himself to pay to the Zionists.
Congress only declared war against Germany because President Wilson informed
Congress that a German submarine had sunk the S.S. Sussex in the English
Channel in violation of international law and that United States citizens
aboard the S.S. Sussex had perished with the ship.
SS Sussex torpedo incident
25 March 1916 ashore at Bologne
After General Pershing's troops were fighting in
Europe, the hoax was exposed. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was used
as the "pretext" to justify a declaration of war against Germany by
the United States. The S.S. Sussex had not been sunk and no United States
citizens had lost their lives. The United States was now at war in Europe as
Great Britain's ally. That is what Great Britain and the Talmudists
("Jews") of the world conspired to achieve in their crooked
diplomatic underworld.
The discovery of the hoax by the British Navy shocked
many honorable Englishmen. A large segment of the British public were shocked
to learn the S.S. Sussex had not been sunk. The S.S. Sussex was available for
anyone to visit who might care to do so to see the S.S. Sussex for themselves
with their own eyes.
In that war the United States mobilized 4,734,991 men
to serve in the armed forces, of whom 115,516 were killed and 202,002 were
either injured or maimed for life. The Right Honorable Francis Neilson, a
member of Parliament, wrote a book in England called The Makers
of War
(pp. 149-150). Mr. Neilson's book created such a sensation that
Mr. Neilson was compelled to resign his seat in Parliament.
Things became so intolerable for Mr. Neilson in Great
Britain as a result of the exposures in his book that he was compelled for his
personal safety to flee from his home in Great Britain and to make his home in
the United States. In Mr. Neilson's book The Makers
of War (pp. 149-150), he discloses many unsuspected and undisclosed
reasons for the outbreak of World War I in Europe in August 1914. With
reference to the alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex in the English Channel, Mr.
Neilson emphasizes:
"In America, Woodrow Wilson, desperate to find a
pretext to enter the war, found it at last in the 'sinking' of the Sussex in
mid-channel. Someone invented a yarn that American lives had been lost. With
this excuse he went to Congress for a declaration of war. Afterwards, the Navy
found that the Sussex had not been sunk, and that no lives had been lost."
This author crossed the English Channel many times on
the S.S. Sussex. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was the figment of an
over-worked Zionist imagination. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was
conceived in the imagination of a Zionist to facilitate the purpose planned and
successfully executed.
3. President Wilson Blackmailed
President Wilson's former sweetheart thought that
Wilson was the logical prospect for that $40,000,00 to help her husband's son.
Mr. Untermeyer visited President Wilson at the White House to break the news to
him about the breach of promise action being considered. Wilson expressed
himself as very fortunate that his former sweetheart went to Mr. Untermeyer to
seek his assistance. The publicity could have proven very embarrassing to
President Wilson if his former sweetheart had instead consulted a Republican
attorney.
President Wilson quickly set Mr. Untermeyer's mind at
rest by informing him that he did not have $40.000.00 available for any
purpose. Mr. Untermeyer suggested that President Wilson should think the matter
over and said he would return in a few days to discuss the matter further. Mr.
Untermeyer used the next few days in Washington looking into the credibility of
the son's story about his pressing need for $40,000.00 to liquidate a pressing
liability. He learned that the son's story was not misrepresented in any way to
his mother by her son.
Mr. Untermeyer returned to President Wilson a few days
later as they had agreed. President Wilson did not hesitate to inform Mr.
Untermeyer that he did not have the $40,000.00 to pay his blackmailer.
President Wilson appeared irritated. Mr. Untermeyer considered the matter a few
moments and then volunteered a solution to President Wilson for his problem.
Mr, Untermeyer volunteered to give President Wilson's
former sweetheart the $40,000.00 out of his own pocket on one condition: that
Wilson promise Untermeyer to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States
Supreme Court a nominee to be recommended to Wilson by Untermeyer.
Without further talk, President Wilson accepted Mr.
Untermeyer's generous offer and Mr. Untermeyer promptly paid the $40,000.00 in
currency to President Wilson 's former sweetheart. The contemplated breach of
promise suit was never heard of after that.
Mr. Untermeyer retained in his possession permanently
the packet of letters to insure against any similar attempt at some future
time. President Wilson was most grateful to Mr. Untermeyer for everything he
was doing to solve problem.
Mr. Untermeyer was a man of great wealth. The law firm
in New York of which he was the leading partner, Messrs. Guggenheim, Untermeyer
and Marshall, is still today one of the nations most prominent and most
prosperous law firms.
Charles M. Schwab
Mr. Untermeyer organized the Bethlehem Steel Company
for his friend, Mr. Charles M. Schwab, who resigned from the United States
Steel Company to form his company in competition with it.
4. Justice Brandeis—The Pay Off
As anyone might reasonably suspect, Mr. Untermeyer
must have had something in mind when he agreed to pay President Wilson's former
sweetheart $40,000.00 out of his own pocket. He paid the money out of his own
pocket in the hope that it might bring to pass a dream close to his heart—a
Talmudist ("Jew") on the United States Supreme Court on which none
had ever served.
Justice Louis D. Brandeis
The day soon arrived when President Wilson was
presented with the necessity of appointing a new member of the United States
Supreme Court. Mr. Untermeyer recommended Louis Dembitz Brandeis for the
vacancy, who was immediately appointed by Wilson.
President Wilson and Justice Brandeis became unusually
intimate friends. Justice Brandeis knew the circumstances of his appointment to
the Supreme Court by President Wilson.
In l9l4 Justice Brandeis was the most prominent and
most politically influential of all Zionists in the United States. As a Justice
of the United States Supreme Court, Brandeis was in a better position than ever
before to be of service to Talmudists ("Jews") both at home and
abroad.
The first opportunity to perform a great service for
his Zionist followers soon became available to Brandeis. Justice Brandeis
volunteered his opinion to President Wilson that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex
by a German submarine in the English Channel with the loss of lives of United
States citizens justified the declaration of war against Germany by the United
States.
Relying to a great extent upon the legal opinion of
Justice Brandeis, President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress on April
2, l9l7. He appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany and they did on
April 7, l9l7.
After the October l9l6 agreement was concluded between
the British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, the Talmudists
throughout the world were hopeful that an international incident would soon
occur to justify a declaration of war against Germany by the United States.
The declaration of war against Germany by the United
States guaranteed the Talmudists throughout the world that Palestine was to be
turned over to them upon the defeat of Germany. The defeat of Germany was
certain if the United States could be railroaded into the war in Europe as
Great Britain's ally.
Prior to the October 1916 London Agreement, Talmudists
throughout the world were pro-German. The German Emancipation Edict of 1822
guaranteed Talmudists in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans. Every
country in Europe had quotas for Talmudists. The quota systems had existed for
centuries in all European countries. Under the quota system in European
countries, Talmudists were Limited in all activities to a small percentage of
the Christian population of the country. The quota systems applied to all
occupations.
After the Emancipation Edict In 1822, Germany was the
only country in Europe which did not place restrictions on Talmudists under a
quota system limiting their civil rights. Talmudists throughout the world were
informed by cable from London about the October 1916 London Agreement. That
information transformed them from pro-German to pro-British.
Great Britain placed at the disposal of Talmudists in
London their secret codes and worldwide cable facilities to inform Talmudists
throughout the world about Great Britain's pledge to turn over Palestine to
them as compensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe
as Great Britain's ally in their war against Germany.
Talmudists enlisted in great numbers in October 1916
in Great Britain's Department of Defense. Their purpose was to facilitate
transforming Talmudists throughout the world from pro-German to pro-British.
After the London Agreement was concluded, Great Britain left no stone unturned
to impress Talmudists in London with the necessity of immediately notifying
Talmudists throughout the world about Great Britain's pledge to turn over
Palestine to them for their future sovereign Zionist state.
Guided by the recommendation of Justice Brandeis that
the sinking of the S.S. Sussex justified a declaration of war under
international law against Germany by the United States, President Wilson
addressed a joint session of both houses of Congress on April 2, 1917. In that
address President Wilson pleaded with Congress to declare war against Germany.
Congress met on April 6. 1917. and declared war
against Germany without justification. On April 6, 1917, President Wilson and
Justice Brandeis knew something the grass roots population of the United States
did not know—they knew full particulars about the October 1916 London
Agreement. They also knew the declaration of war against Germany by the United
States activated this agreement and that Talmudists of the world would not have
to wait long for Palestine, their sovereign Zionist state, if their plan
worked.
On this same day, Wilson and Brandeis knew something
else the grass roots population of the United States did not know—they knew
that the declaration of war by the United States against Germany discharged
President Wilson from his obligation to his blackmailers. Wilson's declaration
of war was to satisfy his commitment to his blackmailers.
There was seldom any address made to Congress that
stirred the people of the United States, and the world, as did President
Wilson's April 2, 1917, plea to Congress to declare war against Germany. Wilson
was aware when he addressed Congress that Germany had not committed any act
against the United States which justified a declaration of war by the United
States against Germany under international law. This author at that time knew
President Wilson was informed to that effect before he made his plea to
Congress.
5. Lloyd George - A Zionist Tool
There were great numbers of Talmudists in the United
States who questioned the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement. They
found it extremely difficult to believe that Great Britain would promise to
turn over Palestine to them as compensation for railroading the United States
into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. These Talmudists could not
believe that Great Britain would promise anything to anyone that Great Britain
did not own as compensation. That appeared inconceivable to Talmudists familiar
with Great Britain's reputation for respect of property rights under their
laws.
Lloyd George
To overcome doubts that existed in the minds of
Talmudists in the United States, Prime Minister Lloyd George immediately
sent Mr. Josiah Wedgewood to the United States. Mr. Wedgewood was one
of the most respected and dedicated members of Parliament.
Josiah Wedgwood
Prime Minister Lloyd George, a rabid well-known
Zionist, was unexpectedly appointed Prime Minister on December 4, 1916. He
rushed Mr. Wedgewood to the United States on December 5, 1916, under pressure
by Talmudists in London. The prime minister whom Lloyd George succeeded was
unsympathetic toward Zionist objectives. He was replaced at that time because
Zionists could not rule him.
Great Britain was helpless in October 1916. It was
seriously considering surrender to Germany. Germany had made several peace
offers to Great Britain earlier to discontinue the war. Mr. Lloyd George
considered Mr. Wedgewood's hasty trip to the United States vital to Great
Britain's survival. Mr. Wedgewood went to the United States with documented
evidence proving the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement with the
Talmudists.
6. Edward M. House - Conspirator
Colonel Edward Mandell House
Mr. Wedgewood arrived in the United States on December
23, 1916. Upon his arrival he was met at the pier by Colonel Edward Mandel
House, President Wilson's closest personal friend and most trusted adviser.
Col. House in early life negotiated cotton purchases
in the United States for Rothschild interests in Great Britain. Col. House did
not claim or disclaim his Talmudist ancestry to this author.
He had arranged with Mr. Wedgewood to live in his
apartment on 54th Street during his stay in the United States. Col. House
quickly made arrangements for the meeting at which Mr. Wedgewood was to prove
the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement.
The meeting was to be held on Sunday afternoon,
December 25, l916, at the old Hotel Savoy at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue in
New Yolk City. There were fifty-one invited Talmudists present there when Col.
House introduced Mr. Wedgewood to the audience. Mr. Wedgewood then presided.
Mr. Wedgewood presented evidence there that left no
doubt in the minds of the fifty-one Talmudists present about the reality of the
October 1916 London Agreement. On behalf of Mr. Lloyd George, Mr. Wedgewood
further vouched for the reality of Great Britain pledge that Palestine would be
turned over to Talmudists of the world by Great Britain upon the defeat of
Germany as compensation for railroading the United States into the war in
Europe as Great Britain's ally.
After concluding the October 1916 London Agreement,
Talmudists in England were invited by Great Britain to take an increasingly
active participation in Great Britain's Department of Defense for the duration
of the war. The Talmudists who accepted the invitation were trained as experts
in the use of Great Britain's codes and Great Britain's worldwide diplomatic
cable facilities.
The available data in Great Britain's archives for
World War I will dispel all existing doubt whether the information cabled to
Washington from London alleging the sinking of the S.S. Sussex and the loss of
United States lives was the invention of Talmudists in London in Great
Britain's Department of Defense to facilitate and expedite railroading the
United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
The hoax was discovered by the British Navy. It was
also confirmed by other equally reliable sources for information on the subject
by qualified united States experts. The reality of the October l9l6 London
Agreement was known to the Germans shortly after it was concluded, in fact, on
the same day. Germany thereafter exercised great care both on land and on sea
not to commit any act which, under international law, could provide the United
States with justification to declare war against Germany.
German military and naval commanders leaned over
backwards in their effort not to provide the United States with that
justification and they were successful. In the crisis in October 1916, Germans
had reason to feel if the war in Europe continued a few more months without the
entrance of the United States into the war, that Great Britain would be compelled
to surrender to Germany by circumstances beyond Great Britain's power to
control.
Germany made another peace offer to Great Britain in
October 1916. Great Britain this time welcomed the offer but it was also
declined like several previous peace offers.
In referring to the declaration of war against Germany
by the United States, Sir Winston Churchill said in an interview with a
prominent editor, published in Scribner's Commentator in 1936, that he
"could never understand why he put us in in 1917," referring to
President Wilson. In that interview Sir Winston Churchill stated further:
Winston Churchill
"America should have minded her own business and
stayed out of the World War. If you hadn't entered the war the Allies would
have made peace with Germany in the spring of 1917. Had we made peace there
would have been no collapse of Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in
Italy followed by Fascism, and Germany would not have signed the Versailles
Treaty, which has enthroned Nazism in Germany. If America had stayed out of the
war, all of these 'isms' wouldn't be sweeping the continent of Europe and
breaking down parliamentary government, and if England made peace early in
1917, it would have saved over one million British, French, American and other
lives."
Germany's peace offer to Great Britain asked for
neither indemnities nor reparations. Germany offered to restore the territorial
status and the political independence of every country with whom Great Britain
was at war, as they existed in August l9l4 when the war in Europe started.
Germany demanded no benefits.
7. Selecting America’s Ally in WWI
Germany's October 1916 peace offer was on the table
before the British War Cabinet; it needed only one signature to end the war.
Great Britain would have quickly accepted Germany's peace offer if the World
Zionist Organization had not Interfered.
The British War Cabinet was then taking their
instructions from Talmudists in London. When the British War Cabinet decided to
accept Germany's peace offer, the World Zionist Organization offered to
railroad the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally if
Great Britain promised the Talmudists of the world Palestine as compensation
after Germany's defeat with the United States as an ally.
Talmudist pressure in London and New York prevailed.
President Wilson had little choice in the matter, it seemed. He was the captive
of circumstances in his early life that could not be altered. His April 2,
1917, address to Congress was about to decide the fate of the world.
Congress, without hesitation, declared war against
Germany for him.
The Germans attributed their crushing defeat in World
War I to the entry of the United States into the war in Europe as Great
Britain's ally. Germany considered the October 1916 London Agreement a stab in
the back by Talmudists of the world.
In view of the Emancipation Edict in Germany in 1822,
Germans regarded the London Agreement as a double-cross by Talmudists in
Germany. Quota systems then existed in all other countries in Europe. There was
no quota system in Germany after the Emancipation Edict of 1822 for Talmudists.
8. Promoting Germans Victory and Stabbing Them in the Back
Germany extended opportunities to Talmudists not
available in other European countries.
The Kaiser himself arranged the personal meeting
between the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and Theodore Herzl.
Bleichroeder & Company in Berlin were the private
bankers of the Kaiser's family for generations. They were Talmudists.
Warburg & Company of Hamburg were the world's
largest merchant bankers. They were Talmudists.
The head of the German General Electric Company, then
the world's largest industrial enterprise, was a Talmudist.
The head of the Hamburg- American and North German
Lloyd steamship companies, the two largest steamship companies in the world,
second only to the Cunard Line, was a Talmudist.
Countless prominent German industrialists, bankers and
merchants were Talmudists. The attitude of Germans towards Talmudists in
Germany and throughout the world worsened much after the October 1916 stab in
the back by Talmudists.
Mr. Samuel Landman, the secretary of the World Zionist
Organization in London from 1917 to 1922, wrote in his Great
Britain, the Jews and Palestine, published in London in 1936, on page six:
"The fact that it was Jewish help that brought
the U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies has rankled ever since in
German- - especially Nazi--minds and has contributed in no small measure to the
prominence which anti-Semitism occupied in the Nazi programme."
The sentiments of prominent German leaders were
expressed in the Jewish Daily Bulletin of New York City on October 30, 1934, in
an article reprinted on page three from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency dispatch
from Berlin which stated:
"The New Germany persists toward the complete
extermination of the Jew because it was Jews who instigated the United States
to enter the World War, accomplishing the defeat of Germany, and who later
caused the inflation in Germany, Herr Richard Kunze, a leading Nazi Parliament
figure, declared at a mass meeting in Magdeburg yesterday."
Talmudists throughout the world made bad matters worse
on August 7, 1933, when they declared their "holy war" to destroy the
German nation "by destroying their export trade upon which their very
existence depends."
Under the leadership of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer,
Talmudists of the world declared a world boycott on all German goods and
services. They asked their "Christian friends" to join their
worldwide boycott of German goods and services.
Mr. Samuel Untermeyer arranged for the
"International Boycott Conference" in Amsterdam in July 1933. There
he was elected the president of the "World Jewish Economic
Federation." Talmudists throughout the world had tried in vain since 1919
to silence German resentment against them for railroading the United States
into the war in Europe without justification or provocation by the United
States as Great Britain's ally.
Talmudists were held responsible for Germany's defeat
and for every disadvantage that resulted from that defeat.
The New York Times of August 7, 1933, published the
Talmudists' declaration of their "holy war" against Germany in a
three-column report of Mr. Untermeyer's address to the nation from the Columbia
Broadcasting Company's studio on the night of his arrival home from Europe.
Mr. Untermeyer, among other things, stated:
"...holy war...in which we are embarked..it is a
war which must be waged unremittingly...the Jews are the aristocrats of the
world... the economic boycott against all German goods, shipping and
services...boycott is our only really effective weapon...bring the German
people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very
existence depends...we shall force them to learn...it is not sufficient that
you buy no goods in Germany...you must refuse to deal with any merchant or
shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods...we will drive the last nail in the
coffin... "
That statement was made on August 7, 1933, when not a
hair on the head of a Talmudist in Germany had been touched.
Germany was plunged into a depression difficult to
describe in a few words, Germany's export business suddenly ending as if by
magic. Talmudists hoped that way to stop Germans from continuing to talk about
why they lost the war. Talmudists in Germany were finding it difficult to live
that down. Germans then felt the way Sir Winston Churchill in 1936 expressed
himself about the entry of the United States into World War I in 1917.
9. Worldwide Zionist Boycott against
Nazi Germany
The eminent Rabbi Maurice L. Perlman, head of the
British Section of the World Jewish Congress, stated to a Canadian audience as
reported by The Toronto Evening Telegram of February 26, 1940, that:
"The World Jewish Congress has been at war with
Germany for seven years."
Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon delivered an address on
December 20, 1951, as reported in The National Jewish Post of Indianapolis of
December 28, 1951, in which he stated:
"One of the major causes for our going to war
against Hitler was the persecution of the Jews in Germany."
Dr. Donald C. Blaisdell, professor of government at
the College of the City of New York, published an important document
entitled American Policy for the near East in a publication
called Issues published in New York, the official organ of the American Council
for Judaism, in the fall issue in 1959, in which Dr. Blaisdell stated:
"No minority of Irish, of German, of Polish,
Italian, or Greek extraction has been able to manipulate policy to its
advantage as have the Zionist leaders of American Jews. Nor does there appear
to be any politically feasible means by which the American government can place
the claims of its important clientele in proper perspective. Like American Jews
who are presumed to be members of Israel's American clientele are never allowed
to forget it, so the American government, Congress and Executive branch alike,
is never permitted to free itself from the pressure, propaganda and power
emanating from the same Zionist sources."
This author has been in a position since 1912 to
witness what was going on behind the scenes. This author served on the National
Democratic Committee in the 1912 campaign that elected President Wilson to his
first term. No doors have been closed to this author since then. This author
was ushered into this world in 1890 by Dr. Simon Baruch, the father of Mr.
Bemard M. Baruch. Mr. Bemard Baruch was a good friend of this author's family
and would very often consult this author on this situation.
10. Franklin D. Roosevelt
Manipulated
President Franklin D. Roosevelt was a captive of the
Talmudists from the time he went to Albany as govemor of the state of New York.
President Roosevelt was long beholden to the Talmudists.
The story of how President Roosevelt lied the United
States into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds
itself in the Middle East is not a long story. It is the story of how President
Roosevelt railroaded the United States into the Second World War: Germany and
Poland had agreed upon a formula giving Germany access across the Danzig
Corridor.
President Wilson, in 1919, created the Danzig Corridor
which separated Gemmany into two halves. In order to keep Germany weak, at the
instigation of Talmudists at the Versialles Peace Conference, President Wilson
cut Germany into two halves, separated by a strip of German territory granted
to Poland which divided Germany into two halves.
Crossing the Danzig Corridor from western Germany to
eastern Germany or vice versa was like traveling from one country to another.
The inconveniences, the delays and the annoyances to Germany and Poland had
finally worked out their acceptable arrangement that eliminated a majority of
German objections to the Danzig Corridor.
Germany and Poland reached a basis that would serve to
prevent Germany's resort to more aggressive action. Adolf Hitler was the head
of the German government at the time. Talmudists throughout the world opposed
the peaceful adjustment between Germany and Poland of the Danzig Corridor
situation. Unrestricted access of traffic between the western half and the
eastern half of Germany would soon make Germany again the most powerful country
in the world. Talmudists throughout the world dreaded the thought.
In spite of the difficulties placed in the way of
reaching a solution for the Danzig Corridor problem, Germany and Poland finally
agreed upon a formula. Preparations were being made to consummate their
understanding in a treaty. Both Germany and Poland were satisfied the formula
agreed upon served both governments.
Shortly before the agreement with Germany was to be
signed, Poland secretly signed a treaty with Great Britain dated August 25,
l939. Great Britain agreed in that treaty to hasten the military assistance of
Poland "with all the support and assistance in its power" if Poland
were attacked by Germany.
With that assurance from Great Britain, Poland broke
off negotiations with Germany. Germany did not understand the reason for
Poland's sudden change of mind and decided to proceed with the terms of the
arrangement agreed upon with Poland. That was the start of World War II.
Great Britain knowingly deceived Poland when Great
Britain actually promised military assistance to Poland if Poland were attacked
by Germany. Great Britain could not come to Poland's assistance and Great
Britain knew it when Great Britain's offer of military assistance to Poland was
made.
Poland fell into Great Britain's trap and discontinued
negotiations with the Germans. Poland's unexplained discontinuance of
negotiations with Germany to complete the Danzig Corridor agreement resulted in
Germany's troops moving into the Danzig Corridor without an agreement with Poland.
Great Britain knew exactly what would take place in that event, that it would
mean the beginning or World War II. The rest is history.
Talmudists of the world welcomed a war against Germeny
in l939 to somehow crush the Nazi government as the Talmudists of the world
crushed Germany in World War I in 1917 by railroading the United States into
the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
President Roosevelt tried his hardest in 1939 to
railroad The United States into the war in Europe to accommodate Talmudists in
the United States. Germany learned by experience in World War I that the entry
of the United States into thc war in Europe in 1939 could prove equally
disastrous to Germany if the United States were raiiroaded into war in Europe
as Great Bntain's ally.
Germany exercised extraordinary caution not to provide
the United States with justification under internationai law to declare war
against Germany. That situation presented President Roosevelt with a problem.
President Roosevelt decided if it were impossible for him to get into the war
in Europe through the front door that he would railroad the United States into
the war in Europe through the back door.
Through the back door meant through Japan. Presidcnt
Roosevelt finally did railroad the United States into the war in Europe through
the back door, through Japan.
11. US Secretary of Defense Makes
Startling Revelation
Germany and Japan had a treaty under which if either
Germany or Japan were attacked by a third powcr, the country which was not
attacked by the third power automaticaily is at war with that third power.
President Roosevelt planned to provoke Japan so Japan
would attack the United States.
New York Times December 08, 1941
Japan in December 1941 attacked Pearl Harbor. The
United States immediately declared war against Japan and automatically was at
war with Germany.
The personal diary of the Hon. Mr. Henry L. Stimson
and all his papers are in Yale University Library. Mr. Stimson each day entered
in his personal diary in his own handwriting the important events in his life
that day. Mr. Stimson was President Roosevelt's secretary of defense. Mr.
Stimson's diary was introduced as evidence in the United States Senate
investigation of the Pearl Harbor attack by Japan over the strong objections of
friends of President Roosevelt.
Henry L. Stimson c.1929
Mr. Stimson entered in his diary on November 25, 1941,
two weeks before Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, that at a meeting with
President Roosevelt and his cabinet that morning at the White House, President
Roosevelt told those present that he wished to be at war against Japan but that
he "did not want it to appear that the United States fired the first shot."
12. Conspirators Provoke Pearl
Harbor Incident
President Roosevelt knowingly provoked Japan to attack
the United States. President Roosevelt advised Japan they could purchase no
more steel scrap or oil from the United States. Japan was in the midst of a war
against China. Without scrap steel and without oil Japan would be unable to
continue that war. Japan was totally dependent upon the United States for both
steel scrap and oil.
Professor Charles Callan Tansill, professor of
diplomatic history at Georgetown University in Washington, wrote a classic work
he called Back Door
to War, published by Henry Regnery of Chicago in 1952. Professor Tansill spent
five years after the war in the confidential files of the State Department
doing research there on World War II.
Professor Tansill's book has 652 pages all filled with
alarming authenticated facts little known to the public during the war. In a
scholarly detailed manner easily understood, Professor Tansill supplies facts
which are incontrovertible proof showing how President Roosevelt railroaded the
United States into World War II in Europe.
President Roosevelt's desire to please Talmudists
among his friends, influenced his better judgment. He overlooked that he was
president of all the people of the United States.
President Roosevelt realized if he expected political support by Talmudists in the United States to continue he must find some way to railroad the United States into the war then in progress in Europe against Germany. Surely nobody can any longer question that railroading the United States into World War II was President Roosevelts contribution to the desperate predicament in which the United States today funds itself in the Middle East.
Harry S. Truman 1948
President Harry S. Truman made his great contribution
to the desperate predicament in which the United States today funds itself in
the Middle East when he recognized as a sovereign state an armed uprising in
Palestine by 800,000 armed aliens transplanted into Palestine in a conspiracy
organized by Talmudists throughout the world. President Truman in 1946 suffered
from a pathological obsession that he must be elected president of the United
States in 1948 on his own account.
Clarke M. Clifford
Mr. Clarke M. Clifford, Secretary of War under
President Lyndon B. Johnson, deserves a great deal of credit for the
recognition of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, by the United States.
Eliahu Eilat (Epstein) Israel Ambassador to London
1958
Mr. Eliahu Epstein, the United States representative
of the Jewish Agency in Washington in 1948, told the story in his three- page
article in the Jewish Chronicle of London in its 10th anniversary issue of June
1958 celebrating the 10th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel.
Mr. Clifford undoubtedly was anxious to help because
President Truman had confided in his close friends that he wished to recognize
the Zionist state in the "first hour of its birth" as he did.
The State of Israel was officially
"proclaimed" in Tel Aviv at midnight on May 14, l948. President
Truman recognized the birth of the State of Isreal eleven minutes after
midnight.
President Truman finally advised this author that he
did not wish to carry on the discussion of the Zionist question with him any
further. He wrote to this author that he had turned over the entire Palestine
question to "the Hon. David Niles."
Talmudists were willing to carry out their part of
their bargain with President Truman after he recognized the State of Israel.
Although the odds in President Truman's election in 1948 were 20 to 1 against
his election, President Truman romped home the winner over Governor Dewey
assisted by the invisible and invincible Zionist political steam-roller that
always elects their candidates.
President Truman not only used the power and prestige
of the United States to compel the United Nations to admit the State of Israel
as a peace-loving nation, the regime of an armed uprising in Palestine by
transplanted aliens, but he made billions of United States taxpayers dollars
available to Talmudists to make the State of Israel powerful.
When the day to vote for the admission of the State of
Iseral arrived they were short two votes. The plan was about to collapse. In
the emergency, Mr Charles H. Silver engaged Cardinal Spellman to make two trips
to South America to change their votes in the United Nations against the
admission of the State of Israel into the United Nation to vote in favor of the
admission of the State of Israel into the United Nations as a member.
The newspapers around the world on June 11, 1964,
published Mr. Silver's "confession" of a "secret I have kept for
fifteen years."
The "secret" Cardinal Spellman kept with Mr.
Silver was that Cardinal Spellman was sent to South America by Mr. Silver on
behalf of the Talmudists in New York to "persuade" the South American
countries to change their votes against admitting the State of Israel to the
United Nations to vote in favor of admitting the State of Israel to the United
Nations as a member.
This author was a close personal friend of Cardinal
Spellman for twenty-five years. Cardinal Spellman "confessed" to this
author several years ago that he felt he had committed an irreparable sin by
conspiring with the Talmudists in the United States to elect the State of
Israel a member of the United Nations.
In the midst of that bloody fighting in the Middle
East in June 1967, Cardinal Spellman told this author when alone with him in
his study that he felt personally responsible for all the lives lost in the
1967 invasion of the United Arab Republic and Syria by the State of Isreal.
13. A Pressured Eisenhower and
Resolution 117
Dwight D. Eisenhower
The story of how President Dwight D. Eisenhower lied
the United States into the desperate predicament in which the United States
today finds itself in the Middle East is not a complicated story.
Talmudists in the United States pressured President
Eisenhower into sponsoring Joint Resolution by Congress of H J Res. 117, on
January 5, 1950, which was then refined by Congress to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs.
President Eisenhower knew less about what he was doing
than a new born babe. It was pitiful for this author to witness a great general
being figuratively pushed around by Talmudists unfit to shine his shoes.
President Eisenhower was always friendly towards this
author. This author met President Eisenhower when he was being considered by
Mr. Thomas M. Watson, Sr., as a presidential candidate on the Democratic
ticket.
Mr. Watson was the founder of the International
Business Machines Company (IBM). He told this author at that time that he
believed General Eisenhower as a Civilian would make a great president.
As president of the United States, General Eisenhower
was faithful to these Talmudist supporters whose friendship he first cultivated
in Europe during his political activities in Germany after the end of World War
II.
Talmudists curried his favor after World War II. They
knew that as president of the United States, General Eisenhower in their hands
would be like clay in the hands of the potter.
In 1956 it appeared that Middle East countries were
undergoing changes in their governments. The Zionist illegal occupation of
Palestine still existed. Populations in Middle East countries were growing restless.
Talmudists recognized something must be done to silence the unrest. President
Eisenhower then obliged the Talmudists.
Lebanon is the heart of Middle East political
activity. To nip action in the bud, by native populations aiming to assert
their independence from domination by Talmudists, Talmudists arranged with
President Eisenhower to occupy Lebanon with fourteen thousand (14,000) troops
and to station the Sixth Fleet off the coast. To make it legal, Talmudists had
Congress pass a Joint resolution like the Tonkin Bay Resolution passed by
Congress to legalize the war in Vietnam.
14. Eisenhower Fulfills the Zionist
Demands in Middle East
Sixth Fleet underway in the Mediterranean c. 1954
President Eisenhower occupied Lebanon with fourteen
thousand (14,000) United States troops and stationed the Sixth Fleet off the
Lebanon coast. President Eisenhower was warning the Middle East nations not to
attempt to regain Palestine from the Zionists in illegal possession of
Palestine.
President Eisenhower must have had a consortium of the
smartest Talmudists in the state defense and justice departments prepare that
joint resolution. The intent of that unclear language is to conceal the purpose
of the joint Resolution not to explain its purpose.
The purpose was to have a joint resolution in record
that would permit President Eisenhower to use the United States armed forces
and navy to aid and abet the Zionist thieves to hold onto their stolen loot
without any necessity to ask Congress to declare war. Every word President
Eisenhower uttered to defend the crooks in occupation of Palestine was a lie
which contributed to the desperate predicament in which the United States today
finds itself in the Middle East. Talmudists in the United States were able to
camouflage their illegal aggression in the Middle East behind the glamour of
President Eisenhower's record as a great soldier.
15. John F. Kennedy Pledges Zionists
John F. Kennedy
The story of how President John F. Kennedy lied the
United States into the desperate predicament in which the United States today
finds itself in the Middle East is very distressing. President Kennedy's future
was uncertain after digressing on August 25, l960, from the straight and narrow
path he had followed all his life. President Kennedy could not escape the
consequences of his betrayal of the high principles to which he aimed to
dedicate his life.
President Kennedy surrendered to the lure of
Talmudists who pledged to put him in the White House as the president of the
United States. On August 23 1960, in the United States Senate office building
in Washington President Kennedy, at that time a senator, gave this author a
copy of the address he was to deliver in New York City on August 25, 1960. In
the copy of that address he stated among other things:
"Israel...three weeks ago I said in a public statement
'Israel is here to stay...my flat prediction that Israel is here to stay...will
endure and flourish...a special obligation on the Democratic Party...it was
President Truman who first recognized the new State of Israel and gave it
status in world affairs...may I and...my hope and my pledge to continue the
democratic tradition...if the Democratic platform is to have any meaning...the
White House must take the lead...American intervention.. will not now be
easy...I propose that we make it crystal clear...we will act promptly and
decisively...I propose that we make it clear...our guarantee that we will act
with whatever force and speed are necessary..the risk of war..."
President (Senator) Kennedy was giving Talmudists his
pledge that as the president of the United States he would send sons, husbands
and brothers of the grass roots population of the United States to fight in
Palestine under the flag of the United States in a war in Palestine to help
crooks hold onto stolen loot, to aid and abet thieves retain possession of
their stolen plunder.
This author met President Kennedy for the first time
in his father's office at 230 Park Avenue, in New York City, on the day after
he was elected for the first time as a Congressman in November l946. This
author was in a conference with Ambassador Joseph Kennedy and Judge Landis, an
associate of Ambassador Kennedy. In his private office they were consulting
this author on the Middle East situation which had recently taken an ugly turn
in the United Nations.
16. John F. Kennedy Enlightened on
the Palestine Question
Ambassador Kennedy discussed the subject matter for a
short while with those present. The Congressman then asked to leave as he was
catching a train for Washington. This author invited the Congressman to lunch
and he accepted. After lunch Congressman Kennedy asked if this author had
nothing else to do, then ride to Washington with him on the train. This author
was willing and rode to Washington with him. From that day in November l946 to
August 23, l960, this author saw the Congressman, and the Senator, countless
times in his office in Washington and New York City.
This author was happy to enlighten Senator Kennedy on
the Palestine question. Without a doubt there were soon few people in the world
who were better informed on this subject than Senator Kennedy. In the fourteen
years this author had the honor of enjoying the confidence of President Kennedy
he never failed to express his appreciation for this author's interest in his
career.
President Kennedy also appreciated the friendship this
author demonstrated for his father, Ambassador Kennedy. Ambassador Kennedy was
blackmailed by President Roosevelt. President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy
not to write the book he planned to write. President Roosevelt removed
Ambassador Kennedy as Ambassador to the Court of St. James in London for
circulating what Neville Chamberlain told Ambassador Kennedy in London in l938.
17. Neville Chamberlain and
Ambassador Kennedy Sr.
Chamberlain complained to Ambassador Kennedy that
United States Ambassador to France, William C. Bullit, in 1938 was urging
President Roosevelt that Germany must be "faced down" in their
attitude towards Poland in the Danzig Corridor matter. President Roosevelt
recalled Ambassador Kennedy to silence him.
Ambassador Kennedy planned to return to the United
States to write a book telling what he knew that he thought the grass roots
population of the United States should be told. President Roosevelt sent for
Ambassador Kennedy upon his return to the United States to come to Washington
to see him. President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy that he had heard that
he was planning to write a book which he asked him not to do. After Ambassador
Kennedy's unpleasant meeting with President Roosevelt in Washington after his
recall from London for daring to circulate what Chamberlain had told him about
Talmudists, his ambition in life was to see one of his sons in the White House
as president of the United States.
The story of how President Lyndon Baines Johnson lied
the United States into the desperate predicament in which the United States
today finds itself in the Middle East is not a long story. It commences with a
telephone call to this author in New York from Congressman Ed Gosset in
Washington to come there at once.
Congressman Gosset represented Amarillo, Texas, in the House of Representatives. Congressman Gosset was alarmed that the Senate Armed Services Committee the day before confirmed the appointment of
Anna M.
Rosenberg as Assistant Secretary of Defense without a public hearing.
The only witness who appeared to testify concerning
Anna Rosenberg's fitness to serve as Assistant Secretary of Defense was Ann
Rosenberg herself. That by itself aroused suspicion among the country's
leaders.
Congressman Gosset took this author to Senator
Johnson's office and explained to him the reason for the visit. Senator Johnson
was a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee which had confirmed Anna
Rosenberg's appointment the previous day.
Senator Johnson was very much interested in learning
about Anna Rosenberg's associations with communists. Senator Johnson asked this
author if he would assist him in looking into the matter further by producing a
communist who knew Anna Rosenberg.
Upon this author's return to New York that day, he
mentioned Senator Johnson's request to his attorney, Mr. Hallam Richardson.
Within a few hours, Mr. Richardson produced Mr. Ralph de Sola, a prominent
communist, the head of film photography of documents by communist Organizations
in the United States.
After Anna Rosenberg's confirmation by the Senate
Armed Services Committee was withdrawn, another hearing was held to confirm her
second appointment. Anna Rosenberg testified she was born in Hungary and came
to the United States in 1912 at the age of eleven years. The second hearing
brought out some interesting facts--it confirmed her extended appointment for
four years.
In this author's meetings with Sen. Johnson, this
author had occasion to discuss the Palestine question with him. Senator Johnson
was very interested in the Palestine question. That subject was of great
interest to the Senate Armed Services Committee. The occupation of Palestine by
the Zionists concerned the Armed Services Committee.
18. Lyndon B. Johnson and the
so-called Six Day War
B. Johnson
Senator Johnson was vice-president before the death of
President Kennedy elevated him. He then became president of the United States.
As president of the United States, Johnson was aware of the possibility of
armed conflict in the Middle East in which the United States might become
involved.
President Johnson understood the power Talmudists
exerted in the United States and in the United Nations. One of his closest
friends in Washington was Mr. Abe Fortas, a prominent Zionist, whom President
Johnson appointed to the Supreme Court.
President Johnson knew he was violating the letter and
spirit of his oath of office as the president of all the people of the United
States when he filled the pipe lines of the State of Israel with munitions of
war paid for with the money of Christian taxpayers in the United States.
President Johnson cannot plead ignorance of the facts.
Though a very close mutual friend, this author kept
President Johnson constantly informed on developments in the Middle East.
President Johnson will be the first to admit he lied the United States into the
desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the
Middle East if he will glance at the promises, pledges and predictions he made
to Talmudists in the United States while he occupied the White House as
president of the United States.
President Johnson now seeks to justify his generosity
with United States taxpayers' money by referring to a "commitment."
President Johnson knows that he is in error. The only commitment the taxpayers
in the United States recognize is President Johnson's commitment to serve the
best interests of the grass roots population of the United States.
According to the The Pentagon Papers he was not very successful in that respect. President Johnson does
not display mature judgment when he squanders billions of the taxpayers'
hard-earned dollars to aid and abet crooks to hold onto their stolen loot,
their stolen plunder. President Johnson would feel differently if the Soviet
Union financed an invasion of Texas by Mexicans who expelled Texans from their
homes with only shirts on their backs to survive in refugee camps in the
deserts of Arizona and New Mexico on six cents a day for food provided by the
United Nations.
Mexicans have a more legitimate claim to the territory
called Texas today than the eastern European Talmudists ever had to Palestine.
What would President Johnson's attitude have been if the Soviet Union
contributed thirty-two billion dollars ($32,000,000,000.00) to go towards
entrenching these Mexican invaders in Texas, and then supplying the Mexican
invaders with sophisticated military hardware to threaten the other forty-nine
United States if they interfered with the illegal possession of Texas by the
Mexican invaders in illegal occupation of Texas, without having paid one cent
to the lawful landowners for a square foot of Texas.
The story how President Nixon lied the United States
into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself is
of great interest to the grass roots population of the United States every time
President Nixon grants the Zionists, in illegal occupation of Palestine,
another five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000.00) of United States
tnxpayers' money. Is President Nixon serving two masters?
President Nixon is as guilty as the other six masters
of deception who lied the United States into the desperate predicament in which
the United States today finds itself in the Middle East. President Nixon is
both an eminent lawyer and President of the United States.
President Nixon cannot produce any evidence of a
legitimate "commitment" to anyone to support President Nixon's
generous use of United States taxpayers' money for financing the permanent
possession by thieves of their stolen loot. Does President Nixon mean the
"commitment" by political leaders to the Talmudists in the United
States who control the media for mass information?
President Nixon belittles himself as well as the
United States Administration for whom he speaks when he talks about a
"commitment" of the United States to underwrite the perpetual
possession of the illegal and immoral theft of Palestine by Talmudists.
President Nixon's generosity has reached epidemic proportions. Each of the additional five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000.00) of United States taxpayers' money he donates to the so-called State of Israel is that many more nails in the coffin of the United States
These seven masters of deception mock the elementary
and equitable principles upon which the United States was founded when they
throw hard-earned United States taxpayers' dollars by the billions to criminals
in possession of their stolen loot as if it were stage money. Have they no
shame or conscience?
When there were civil wars recently in the Congo, in
Nagana, in Pakistan and other countries in this century, did the United States
"recognize" the populations as independent indigenous populations who
planned to secede and form their sovereign independent states? Then why
recognize transplanted alien invaders financed by Talmudists?
If these seven masters of deception reflected the
honorable attitude the United States should exhibit, they would not traffic
with thieves, murderers, and scoundrels as they are doing with the hooligans
from the State of lsrael.
The United States refused to "recognize" the
independence of Katanga, of Biafra, of East Pakistan, of Quebec and of total
Ireland, but they rushed to "recognize" the hooligans of an armed
Palestine uprising by transplanted aliens as a legitimate sovereign state. What
next?
19. Controlling the US Vote in the
United Nations
The one hundred and twenty-five other members of the
United Nations know that the United States was as crooked as a cork screw to
recognize the so-called State of Israel as a lawful representative government
of the indigenous population. The other nations of the world all know by this
time that Talmudists elect the presidents of the United States and members of
Congress.
If these Talmudists in the United States were paupers,
they could not elect a dog catcher in the United States. How rotten can the
political system in the United States get before it drops into the lap of a
more honorable nation like a rotten piece of fruit falls from a tree?
20. Rothschilds and the Suez Canal
The so-called State of Israel is positive that the
United States must at the request of the State of Israel veto any resolution
introduced in the Security Council to expel the so-called State of Israel.
Consequently, this so-called State of Israel feels as smug as a bug in a rug
regardless of what they do.
The Talmudists control the delegation in the United
States. Nobody but a fool or an ignoramus doubts that today.
The Talmudists always instruct the delegates of the
United States how to vote in the Security Council. If a resolution is ever
introduced to expel the so-called State of Israel, the United States must veto
the resolution.
The grass roots population of the United States
deserves to know the truth about the Middle East crisis. They will pay with
their lives unless they soon acquire a better understanding about why the
Middle East crisis exists.
The United States finds it convenient to blame
everything that goes wrong anywhere in the world on Communism. Communism
provides a convenient whipping boy for politicians.
The arch villains behind the world's difficulties are
the Rothschilds. For the moment, this author will only deal with the
Rothschilds interest in the subject matter of this article, the Middle East
desperate predicament of the world. This author can speak with confidence on
this subject as his knowledge was obtained first hand from members of the
Rothschild dynasty in London, New York and elsewhere.
The extent of the Rothschild wealth cannot be
estimated with any degree of certainty. A conservative guess of the total value
of the Rothschild fortunes would be billions of dollars, if that amount can be
imagined. The important thing is the major portion of this wealth is in the Far
East.
The Rothschild interest in Europe, and the Western
Hemisphere, are tremendous. However, in comparison to their wealth in the Far
East, it is significant.
A most vital single thing in the world to the
Rothschild dynasty is access to the Far East. Access to the Far East through
the Mediterranean is know as Great Britain's lifeline. The Rothschild dynasty
had plunged Great Britain into many wars only to preserve their lifeline to the
Far East. History tells that story.
The Suez Canal was not constructed by the Rothschilds.
They did their utmost to prevent its construction. The Suez Canal was
constructed by the Frenchman, de Lesseps, and the Khedive of Egypt. The
Rothschilds refused to invest one cent of their money in the company which
obtained the concession to construct the Suez Canal.
The Suez Canal was completed in 1869. It, from the
very start, proved a great success.
The Rothschilds swindled a forty percent (40%)
interest in the Suez Canal Company from the Khedive of Egypt. They found a
forty percent (40%) interest insufficient for their purpose as the value of the
Suez Canal had been demonstrated after it was in use two years. The Rothschilds
decided they must control their lifeline to their fortune in the Far East.
Without justification or provocation of any
description, the Rothschilds had Great Britain occupy Egypt exactly as a
defeated power is occupied by the victor. The British ran the schools, the
banks, the railroads, the courts, and Egypt ceased to be Egypt except in name.
Naturally, the Suez Canal came under complete control
of Great Britain. The original concession for the Suez Canal was for
ninety-nine years. The more important the Suez Canal became to the Rothschilds,
the more the Rothschilds worried what was going to happen when the ninety-nine
year concession for the Suez Canal expired in 1969 and reverted to Egypt as the
concession provided.
Great Britain spent large fortunes and spilled much
blood in many wars to maintain uninterrupted and undisturbed possession of the
Suez Canal. The Rothschilds knew that Egypt would be free to grant a new
concession for the Suez Canal to a power unfriendly to Great Britain, like
France, Germany or Russia, when the concession expired.
The Rothschilds feared the consequences should the
Suez Canal fall into the hands of an unfriendly power and Great Britain had
many powers in mind who could make good use of the Suez Canal politically also
against the British Empire.
21. Zionist Supervision Necessary to
Control Middle East Situation
The Rothschild dynasty's fortune and Great Britain's
authority would diminish in the Far East if Great Britain no longer controlled
the Suez Canal. Looking ahead, the Rothschilds planned their future without the
Suez Canal.
The First World War ended in l9l8 and the Rothschilds
had their plan ready. Their plan was very simple. Under the October 1916 London
Agreement, Great Britain planned to turn over Palestine to the Zionists after
the war.
The eastern European Talmudists had no money. Without
money Palestine was a headache to the Zionists. The Rothschilds in London
promised the Zionists unlimited financial assistance with which to develop
Palestine, but on one condition—that as soon as Palestine was turned over to
the Zionists, they apply for admission to the British Empire as a member.
The Rothschilds planned to construct a canal in Palestine
from Ashkelon on the Mediterranean to Aqaba on the Gulf of Aqaba. They planned
to construct a modern steel and concrete canal with two lanes for ships. The
canal would be on British territory in perpetuity enjoying the advantages of
defense by Great Britain if needed and international recognition as a member of
the British Empire.
Great Britain occupied Palestine from 1921 to 1948 as
the Mandatory of the League of Nations. During that period the British Empire
fell apart. By the time the Zionists established a Zionist state in Palestine,
the British Empire had fallen apart and no longer existed.
Palestine under the Zionists could not apply for
admission to the British Empire. There was no British Empire. When the
Rothschilds realized what was happening, they were compelled to alter their
plans.
The Rothschilds were determined that Great Britain
must turn over Palestine to the Zionists for a sovereign Zionist state. The
idea of a United Nations was then a reality and the Rothschilds planned upon
getting the sovereign Zionist state admitted to the United Nations.
The United Nations would provide Palestine with the
same advantages that the British Empire would have provided once upon a time.
If the sovereign Zionist state could be admitted to the United Nations,
Palestine's future was assured.
Rothschilds did not know what to do. Then in October
1916, the World Zionist Organization entered the picture. When Great Britain
was considering surrender to Germany, the World Zionist Organization and the
British War Cabinet entered into the October 1916 London Agreement.
The Rothschild dynasty was astonished when, on April
6, 1917, the United States declared war against Germany. By July 1917 it
appeared that Germany would be defeated after the entry of the United States
into the war.
Chaim Weizmann
The Rothschild dynasty sought out Mr. Chaim Weizmann
and cultivated his friendship. The Rothschilds realized that the World Zionist
Organization must be recognized. The Rothschilds purchased a Prince Albert
frock coat and a silk hat for Chaim Weizmann and treated him as though he was
already the head of the government of Palestine, which he eventually became.
The Rothschilds renewed their interest in the plan to
finance the Zionist movement in Palestine in exchange for the concession to
construct their modern canal across Palestine in competition with the Suez
Canal.
Great Britain was certain to defeat Germany. Great
Britain had agreed to turn over Palestine to the Talmudists of the world for
railroading the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.
The only link missing now was the existence in Palestine of an independent
sovereign Zionist state. The Rothschilds financed transplanting 600,000 eastern
European Talmudists into Palestine and arranged to remove the last of General
Allenby's 200,000 British troops from Palestine.
22. Rothschild Interests and
”Chosen” Asiatic Jews
In collaboration with President Truman in the United
States the armed 600,000 transplanted alien Talmudists on May 18, 1948, began
their expulsion from Palestine of the Christian and Moslem disarmed and
defenseless 1,350,000 population and at the same time declared their armed
uprising the State of Israel. The Rothschilds were now satisfied.
The only unfinished business was to force the Middle
East nations to recognize the State of Israel. The Rothschilds commenced their
final stage by building the present oil pipeline from Ashkelon on the
Mediterranean to Aqaba, along the route of their future modern long-planned
steel and concrete two-lane canal.
The Middle East situation is the result of the
Rothschild efforts to secure permanent and secure access to the Far East. This
nonsense about the "repatriation" of "Gods chosen people"
to "their promised land" has been revealed the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated on mankind.
The single purpose of the Rothschilds was to secure
permanent and secure access to their vast natural resources in the Far East.
This author has had the patience and the time to
inform seven presidents of the United States about the underlying reason for
the Middle East aggression by the Talmudist throughout the world. These seven
masters of deception were all briefed by this author on the reason for the
aggression in Palestine. This author spent a small fortune acquainting members
of Congress and political and industrial leaders in the United States with all
these facts, supplying them with photostat reproductions of documentary
evidence to support every statement made by this author.
It cries out to heaven that this country and the world
has been put to the expense of billions of billions of dollars to see the
Rothschilds have secure and permanent access to their unlimited wealth in the
Far East.
If the Talmudists of the world say they are willing to
see another world war fought to establish "God's chosen people" in
"their promised land" to rule the world from Palestine, then it is
time to tell the grass roots of the United States population what all the
excitement is about.
This issue must be dragged into the light for the
grass roots of the population of the United States to see why they are expected
to die in an unnecessary war with a smile on their face.
Facts Are Facts: The Truth About Khazars (80 pp; 1955)
”Christians Duped by Unholiest Hoax in All History!
‘Big Lie’ Technique Pushing U.S.A. to the Brink of World War III” (article in
Common Sense, May 1, 1959, p. 4; mentions the ”Six Million Jew Hoax”)
”Ben Freedman Speaks: The Jews and World War III”(also transcripts with other titles) - speech given before audience in 1961 at
the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s newspaper
Common Sense (recorded time: 92 min. - available from Liberty Bell) AUDIO
Statement, October, 1966 (?; Ben found the six million
figure so exaggerated that he suggested a deliberate swindle)
The Wall Street Jews (audio/book?; available from
Christian Defence League)
Zionist Control of America (available from OmniChristian Book Club)
”My Exploited Father-in-law” by Curtis B. Dall pdf (Christian Crusade Publications, Tulsa, OK)
”When the Cheering Stopped” by Gene Smith (Morrow
& Co., New York)
”The Makers of War” by Francis Neilson (Great Britain;
240 pp)
”Pearl Harbor: The Story of the Secret War” by George
Morgenstern (435 pp)
”Pearl Harbor Reexamined: Prologue to the Pacific War”
by Hilary Conroy and Harry Wray (200 pp)
”Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace: A Critical
Examination of the Foreign Policy of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and its
Aftermath” by Harry Elmer Barnes (740 pp)
”Back Door to War” by Professor Charles Callan Tansill
(1952; 652 pp)
”Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three
Thousand Years” by Israel Shahak (1994)
”The Controversy of Zion” by Douglas Reed (1978; 580
pp)
1875 - Lionel de Rothschild buys most of the stocks in
the Suez Canal
Nov. 24, 1887 - ”His first great success was the acquisition
of Suez Canal shares.” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1999 edition, ”Disraeli,
Benjamin”); Disraeli (D’Israeli), Christian-Jewish Prime Minister of Great
Britain and ”the real creator of the British Empire in the former century” (N.
Goldmann, ”The Jewish Paradox”); father Isaac stated that Judaism ”cuts off the
Jews from the great family of mankind” (Encyclopaedia Britannica); Benjamin
recited the six words of the ”Hebrew Shema” (confessing Jewish faith) at his
deathbed 1881 (Rothschild biographer), thus admitting being one of those
”secret Jews” (Disraeli, ”Tancred,” 1847); ”we cannot be destroyed. It...
baffled Egyptian and Assyrian kings, Roman emperors, and Christian
inquisitors.” (Disraeli, ”Coningsby,” 1844)
1914 - Beginning of war; Great Britain, France and
Russia Vs Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey
(Oct. 1916 - Secret agreement)
April 6, 1917 - America (pro-German) declares war
against Germany on (as Britain’s ally)
Nov. 2, 1917 - Balfour Declaration; written to Lord
(Lionel Walter) Rothschild by secret Jew Leopold Maurice (Moritz) Amery-Saphir
(Nov. 7, 1917 - Bolshevik takeover of Russia supported
and funded by Germany and Jews)
Dec. 9, 1917 - British capture of Jerusalem End of war
1918
1939-1945 - WWII; Nazi-Zionist ”Haavara” (Transfer)
Agreement (1933); Communist-Nazi split of Polish Jewry (1939)
May 14, 1948 - State of Israel
1948-1953 - ”the black years” in Russia (Jewish
Encyclopedia); ”anti-Semitic” Stalin; Stalin dies (1953)
1956 - Israel launches the ”Suez War”
Quotes
”I have the solution to the Jewish Question. I know it
sounds mad; and at the beginning I shall be called mad more than once - until
the truth of what I am saying is recognised in all its shattering force.”
(Theodor Herzl, in his diary)
”If I were to sum up the Basel congress in a single
phrase, I would say, ‘In Basel I created the Jewish State.’ Was I to say this
aloud, I would be greeted by universal laughter, but perhaps five years hence,
in any case, certainly in fifty years, everyone will agree.”
(Theodor Herzl, in his diary)
”Herzl... worked to achieve an object which he had set
as goal... Herzl [did] foresee twenty years, before we experienced them... that
the [world] events would offer the Jewish people fresh opportunities”
(Marcus Ehrenpreis, international rabbi from Sweden)
”... let me tell you the following words as if I were
showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist
(1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposition [1903], the future World War
[WW1, 1914-1918], [the Balfour Declaration 1917,] the peace conference
[1919-1920] where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine [Israel,
three years after WW2] will be created.”
(Max Nordau-Suedfeld, Herzl’s right-hand, speaking at the Zionist Congress
at Basle in August 1903; ”American Jewish News,” New York, Vol. 4, No. 2,
September 19, 1919)
”The Paris Peace conference that gathered in early
1919 oversaw the redrawing of the map of most of Europe and large parts of the
rest of the world. [...] The new German state lost... large stretches of
Prussian lands to Poland, establishing an awkward intrusion, the ‘Polish
Corridor’ to the sea, for the new and otherwise land-locked state of Poland.
[...] The Germans were hardly the only people to feel cheated by the peace treaties,
or to blame Jews for them. [...] The weakness of Hungary in defeat made
possible the temporary victory of a communist takeover... From being a country
whose elites recognized the usefulness of Jews, it became one in which Jews
were widely seen as destroyers. [...] Most of the new countries to emerge from
the collapse of the Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires [after WW1] had
sizable Jewish populations, and the new leaders of these countries were
required by the Allies to accept so-called minority clauses... Many of the
leaders of the new nations saw the minority clauses as providing a way for the
Jews to be able to continue in their prewar economic prevalence - or even to
exercise a behind-the-scenes domination of the new countries... American and British
Jews at the Peace Conference [after WW1] played a key role in the formulation
of the terms of the minority clauses. [...] The Peace Conference dealt with
many issues, including carving up the defunct Turkish Empire, which had
profound implications for the Jewish Question in Europe, in that it opened up a
possible fulfillment of the Zionist dream, establishment of a national home for
Jews in Palestine. [...] In early 1917 [during the end of WW1] it was as if
events conspired to favor the Zionist cause: The armies of the British Empire
began the conquest of Palestine”
(Albert S. Lindemann; ”Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the rise of
the Jews,” pp. 409-416, 1997)
”At its [WW1] start [1914] Baron Edmond de Rothschild
told Dr. [Chaim] Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things
of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.”
(Douglas Reed, former Times correspondent; ”Far and Wide,” p. 285)
”I think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim
for America”
(Dr. Chaim Weizmann, in a letter to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme
Court, dated Jan. 14, 1918)
”In 1919 Dr. Weizmann said, ‘We do not aspire to found
a Zionist State... We cannot hope to rule in a country in which only
one-seventh of the population at present are Jews.’”
(Douglas Reed, former Times correspondent; ”Far and Wide,” p. 318)
”When they met again, Balfour first told Weizmann,
‘You may get your things done much more quickly after the war.’ [...] At the
same time, the London government was keen to interpose something between the
French who were planning to take over Syria, and the Suez canal. In this
respect, the idea of a Jewish Palestine was tempting.”
(”Controversy of Zion” by Geoffrey Wheatcroft, 1996)
”[A] Jewish Palestine would be a safeguard to
Palestine, in particular in respect to the Suez Canal”
(An assurance made to the Zionist and British Assistant Foreign Secretary
Lord Robert Cecil; he was one of the founders of the League of Nations, the UN)
”[Lord Cecil] saw it in its true perspective as an
integral part of world stabilization. To him the re-establishment of a Jewish
Homeland in Palestine and the organization of the world in a great federation
were complementary features of the next step in the management of human
affairs.”
(Chaim Weizmann, first Prime Minister of Israel, about British Assistant
Foreign Secretary Lord Robert Cecil; Weizmann’s ”Trial and Error”)
”[Lloyd George, British Prime Minister] was very
anxious that a determined offensive should be made in Palestine... He was
strongly under the impression that Palestine should be made a decisive feature
of the war”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WWI; called in from South Africa to fight
in Palestine when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
”One of the great objects we fought for in the war was
to provide a national home for the Jewish people”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WWI; called in from South Africa to fight
in Palestine when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
”There never was such nonsense as this idea the Jews
have that they are an exclusive, pure race. They are the most impure race on
earth. I doubt if they are even Semites.”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WWI; called in from South Africa to fight
in Palestine when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
”England has fallen totally into the hands of the Jews
and the Americans. [...] This war [WW1...] is in the deepest sense the war of
Jewry [‘Judentum’] and its near relative, Americanism, for the control of the
world.”
(H.S. Chamberlain, an Englishman living in Germany, in a letter to German
Kaiser Wilhelm II)
”[Russia 1917 shows] insanity in power [... The
Russian people have been] turned over to the vengeance of the Jews, who are
connected with all the Jews of the world.”
(Wilhelm II, German Kaiser, abdicated in 1918 after the Marxist-Jewish
revolution in Germany led to the crumbling of her war effort and the loss of
World War I)
”Where we sink we become revolutionary proletariat,
the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party: when we rise, there rises
also our terrible power of the purse.”
(Theodor Herzl, ”Der Judenstaat,” p. 91, 1946 edition)
”Two million Jews have already been exterminated...
The democracies have a clear duty before them... Let them negotiate with
Germany through neutral countries concerning the possible release of the Jews
in the occupied countries... Let the gates of Palestine be opened to all who
can reach the shores of the Jewish homeland”
(Chaim Weizmann, at a mass demonstration in Madison Square Garden; reported
by the N.Y. Times the day after, March 2, 1943)
”These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these
Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern
Europe. [...] So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how
silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, ‘We’re
going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their
ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.’ Could there be a bigger lie than that?”
(Benjamin H. Freedman, 71 year old Zionist defector, in 1961)
”The President [Roosevelt] called a cabinet meeting
this morning and told us that he wanted us to be at war with Japan, but that he
did not want it to appear to the public that the United States had fired the
first shot.”
(Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of Defense during World War II; from his dairy
for Nov. 21, 1941, two weeks prior to Pearl Harbor)
”I say again and again and again that I will never
send American boys to fight on foreign soil.”
(Slogan of Franklin D. Roosevelt election campaign)
”[Anti-Semitism will] act as a propelling force which,
like the wave of the future, would bring the Jews into the promised land.”
(Theodor Herzl)
”Palestine was not invaded by six million dead Jews,
or, indeed, by any dead Jews”
(Arthur R. Butz; ”The Hoax of the Twentieth Century,” 1976)
”[The Russian Tsar’s laws are] so hard and mean that
they could make many Jews become violent nihilists.”
(Lionel Walter Rothschild, 1868-1937, in a letter to Gerson von Bleichröder,
1890)
”The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most
skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar
and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe; and
all this because they wish to destroy... Christendom which owes to them even
its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.”
(Benjamin Disraeli, a Jewish Prime Minister of Great Britain; ”The Life of
Lord George Bentinck,” 1852)
”Without me Zionism wouldn’t have flourished, and
without Zionism I wouldn’t have done anything.”
(Edmond de Rothschild; Rothschild biographer, Frederick Morton)
”As for the anti-Semitic feelings, the Jews themselves
are to blame, and the present agitation must be ascribed to their arrogance,
vanity and unspeakable insolence.”
(Meyer Carl Rothschild (1820-1886), in a letter to Gerson von Bleichröder)
”The World War [1914-1918] will see the establishment
of Communism in Russia [1917]; a second world war will extend its control over
Europe [true in 1945]; and a third world war will be necessary to make it
worldwide”
(Vladimir Lenin; ”Collected Works”; died in 1924)
”[Lenin] gathered together the leading spirits of a
formidable sect, the most formidable sect in the world... With these spirits
around him he set to work with demoniacal ability to tear to pieces every
institution on which the Russian state and nation depended.”
(Winston Churchill, in the House of Commons, Nov. 5th 1919)
”Should the... Marxist creed, triumph over the people
of this world, [its...] Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this
planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, without any human life
on its surface, as it did millions of years ago.”
(Adolf Hitler; ”My Struggle,” Vol. I, p. 46, 1925)
”It is Semitism gone wild for vengeance and, if it is
ultimately carried out (I can’t believe that it will be) it as sure as fate
will lay the seeds for another war in the next generation.”
(Henry L. Stimson, September, 1944)
”[Roosevelt] met... ally... King Faud of Saudi Arabia
in 1944... promised... not to support a Jewish state in Palestine.”
(Elliott Roosevelt, son of President Franklin, in his book ”As He Saw It”)
”My friends are Jews, the Jews wants the dividing [of
Palestine]. Then they shall have it.”
(Harry S. Truman; quoted in ”The Jewish paradox,” Nahum Goldmann, 1978)
”It was our great fortune, that Roosevelt was replaced
by Harry Truman...”
(Nahum Goldmann, leader World Zionist Organization and World Jewish
Congress; ”The Jewish paradox,” 1978)
”Since it [‘Judenstaat’] now is a state [Israel] it
would be immoral to let it be destroyed, but if one asked me before it existed,
then I would have said, that it isn’t the solution to the Jewish problem.”
(Henry A. Kissinger, a.k.a. Avraham Bel Elazar, Jewish-German-American
Foreign Minister)
”I have been in the position, as a Jew, of conducting
the foreign policy of a superpower.”
(Henry Kissinger, former US national security advisor and secretary of
state, when receiving the Elie Wiesel Holocaust Remembrance Award; Kissinger
was later even in charge of Israel-Arab affairs - after Truman’s resignation)
”We insisted on Palestine not because of religious,
historical or sentimental reasons, but because Palestine is a turning table of
three continents and in the military, political, and strategic sense it is the
world’s center. [...] Besides the oil reserves in this area are much higher
than on the whole American continent.”
(Dr. Nahum Goldmann-Leibmann, then not yet a Zionist leader, at the 7th
meeting of the Canadian Jewish Congress in Spring of 1947; Golda Meir, ”My
Life”)
”The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar, and other
places for the establishment of a Jewish Fatherland, but they wanted absolutely
nothing except Palestine, not because the Dead Sea water by evaporation can
produce five trillion dollars of metalloids and powdered metals; not because
the sub-soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum than all the
combined reserves of the two Americas; but because Palestine is the crossroads
of Europe, Asia, and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the veritable center
of world political power, the strategic center for world control.”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976)
”18 percent of the Jewish people live in Israel and
more than 80 percent in other countries. [...] If the Diaspora Jews decided
tomorrow that Israel didn’t interesting to them anymore, the shop would close
and Israel would cease to exist economical as well as political. Would America
support Israel if American Jewry didn’t care for the country any more?”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976, p. 91)
”I admit that Palestine according the international
laws belongs to you [Arabs- Palestinians]. But we have suffered so much during
two thousand years... Imagine this for a moment, what would happen if all of
people of the earth should require to regain the territories they lost two
thousand years ago. Do you see the chaos, this would result in? But here is a
people, who have the boldness to require this and the world has granted this.
But when I say the world it is not the matter of the masses or even the
diplomats: only the great statesmen. [...] Without Balfour, without Lloyd
George, without Wilson we would never have seen the Balfour Declaration of 1917
or what later occurred.”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976, pp. 98, 99 & 101)
”The Jews are, as I mentioned, a very complicated and
exceptional people. It isn’t easy to have a clear and plain picture of them.
[...] the Arabs have the same memory as the Jews. The Semitic race is very
stubborn and never forgets... one could say [‘the Hebrew people’ but...] ‘the
Jewish people’ is more suitable... Instead of the idea of a ‘chosen people’ I
prefer the one about ‘a unique people’”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976)
”While it is a country God has promised us, it doesn’t
interest them [the Palestinians]. Our God is not their God. We have our origin
in Israel, that’s true... There have been anti- Semitism, Nazis, Hitler,
Auschwitz. But was it their [the Palestinians] fault? They only see one fact:
We have come and we have stole their land. Why should they accept it? They will
maybe forget about it in one or two generations, but for now there is no
chance. It is thus simple: we must remain strong, have a powerful army. There
you have our politics. Otherwise the Arabs will destroy us.”
(David Ben Gurion; Nahum Goldmann, ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976, pp. 98, 99
& 101)
”The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my
imagination... Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of
autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception
of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become
united in an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and here
will be no more wars. In Jerusalem the United States (a truly United States)
will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all
continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all
controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.”
(David Ben-Gurion, a.k.a. Grün, the first Prime Minister of Israel; Look
magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)
”During the almost two thousand years of Diaspora...
there isn’t any person who could compete with the extraordinary personality of
Baron Edmond de Rothschild.”
(David Ben Gurion, first Prime Minister of Israel)
”I ain’t a Philanthropist. [...] I took the initiative
to find out if it’s possible to place Jews on Palestinian soil.”
(Edmond de Rothschild, to one of the founders of Rishon Le Zion, First of
Zion; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
”I have tried to prove that the Children of Israel is
capable of becoming good colonist and farmers, but the only thing you have succeeded
in proving is doing rebellion and committing dissension”
(Edmond in Palestine, to Jewish colonists; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
”[The Rothschilds are...] the most efficient force our
people has known since the Diaspora.”
(Theodor Herzl; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
”My dear Prime Minister,
My father began his colonization work in Israel 75 years ago [1882]. The work
which was then begun has been continued to this day. [My father Edmond...] set
up the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association... We intend to provide the
sum of IL6 million for the construction of the new Knesseth building in
Jerusalem... Let the new Knesseth building become a symbol, in the eyes of all
men, of the permanence of the State of Israel. [...] With this done, P.I.C.A.
will withdraw from the scene of Israel in the knowledge that the work which was
begun 75 years ago is being carried on by the State and the people, supported
by world Jewry. [...] I do not intend, with this letter, to take leave of you
or of Israel. My interest in the development of Israel is abiding, even if
P.I.C.A. must cease to operate, I shall remain as close to you all as I have
always been, your cares will be my cares and your happiness will be my
happiness. [...] The foundations of the State have been well and truly laid. I
am confident that, by the grace of the Almighty, the new chapter in the history
of our people, which began with the creation of the State, will be glorious and
enduring.
Yours Sincerely,
James de Rothschild”
(James de Rothschild, 1878-1957; letter sent to Prime Minister David Ben
Gurion in 1957)
”In 1956 I eagerly swallowed all of Ben-Gurion’s
political and military reasons for Israel initiating the Suez War, until he (in
spite of being an atheist, proud of his disregard of the commandments of Jewish
religion) pronounced in the Knesset on the third day of that war, that the real
reason for it is ‘the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon’ to its
Biblical borders.”
(Israel Shakah; ”Jewish History, Jewish Religion,” 1994)
”David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister, in a speech
to the Knesset on the third day of the Suez War in 1956 stated that the real
reason for the war was the restoration of the Kingdom of David and Solomon to
its Biblical borders. At this point in his speech virtually every Knesset
member spontaneously rose and sang the Israeli national anthem.”
(David Paul; ”Apartheid: Israeli Style,” 1995)
”Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you
the truth? (Galatians 4:16)”
(From the cover of ”Facts are Facts” by Benjamin H. Freedman)
”You have fought two world wars to discover what we
[Arabs] have known for two thousand years.”
(Ibn Saud, Egyptian king, to US president Roosevelt in 1945)
”[T]hey are our lords, yes, our mad tyrants...
Meanwhile they wail that they are our captives”
(Martin Luther, 1543)
Disclaimer:
Some material presented will contain links, quotes, ideologies, etc., the
contents of which should be understood to first, in their whole, reflect the
views or opinions of their editors, and second, are used in my personal
research as "fair use" sources only, and not espousement one way or
the other. Researching for 'truth' leads one all over the place...a piece here,
a piece there. As a researcher, I hunt, gather and disassemble resources,
trying to put all the pieces into a coherent and logical whole. I encourage you
to do the same. And please remember, these pages are only my effort
to collect all the pieces I can find and see if they properly fit into the
'reality aggregate'.
Personal Position:
I've come to realize that 'truth' boils down to what we 'believe' the facts
we've gathered point to. We only 'know' what we've 'experienced' firsthand.
Everything else - what we read, what we watch, what we hear - is what someone
else's gathered facts point to and 'they' 'believe' is 'truth', so that 'truth'
seems to change in direct proportion to newly gathered facts divided by applied
plausibility. Though I believe there is 'truth', until someone celestial who
'knows' all the facts parts the heavens and throws us a scroll titled
"Here Are ALL The Facts And Lies In The Order They Happened," I can't
know for sure exactly what "the whole truth' on any given subject is, and
what applies to me applies to everyone.
~Gail
Bird Allen
