By Larry Romanoff, December 02, 2019
There are occasions where the Americans want to
publish a list that demonstrates their innate moral superiority over the rest
of the world, but they hesitate because the lies are too large even for them
and would expose them to unlimited ridicule.
In such instances, they have a friend do their work
for them, depending on a highly-regarded third-party reference in an attempt to
make the hypocrisy more palatable. On this occasion, they enlisted the services
of the Economist Magazine’s so-called “Intelligence Unit” to produce a list of
the world’s safest cities. The results should surprise even you, with places
like Chicago, Washington, New York and Los Angeles placing right up there near
the top. (1)
The methodology was innovative to say the least. To
most of us a safe city is one where we are safe; that means personal
safety, with little or no likelihood of experiencing the normal events of
daily life in America which would include being mugged, killed, raped, stabbed,
framed by the FBI, or shot dead by the police.
But American cities cannot compete on these metrics
so, with the help of their friends in the UK, designed new metrics in four
categories, namely digital security, health security, infrastructure safety,
and personal safety, each allotted 25% of the total ranking. So now getting
shot by the police in New York or stabbed by one of the 400,000 muggers in
Chicago or Washington assumes equal importance with losing your credit card or
tripping on the sidewalk. Let’s take a quick look.
Digital security related to a city’s “cyber security teams”,
whatever that means, probably the extent to which the NSA is recording
everything you say, and, interestingly, the “frequency of identity
theft”. By the way, did you know that London has one CCTV camera for
every six citizens, and that the US is quickly heading in the same direction? Health
Security was based upon things like the number of hospital beds, a
nation’s life expectancy, and the incidence of cancers. Then we had Infrastructure
Safety, based on things like the quality of its roads, bridges and dams,
and the “number of deaths from natural disasters”. And lastly, we had Personal
Safety, based on some kinds of reported crimes.
So how would American cities, especially those four
listed above, possibly appear near the top of any list of safe places to be on
earth? The US would likely top the list for spying on its citizens, no
argument there, but “cyber-security”? This almost had to be some kind of a
joke. The US is outstanding as the world’s leader in being hacked by almost
everybody almost everywhere. The military, the CIA, the banks, the credit card
companies, credit reporting firms, retailers like Wal-Mart and Target, Sony
Pictures, Facebook, Twitter, major multinationals, are in the news weekly for
having had their records hacked yet again and the personal information
of tens of millions of Americans splashed all over the internet. Identity
theft was born in America, and in no other country do we read so regularly of
this occurring on such huge scales. Where could we find any evidence of
security in the cyber realm in the USA? No place, but the Americans are at the
top anyway.
Health security. In America? The US health care system
is renowned for being the worst in the world unless you’re rich.
The number of hospital beds is of little concern when
everybody is dying in the parking lot because they can’t afford health care.
The US has one of the lowest life expectancies and
highest infant mortality rates of all developed nations and many so-called developing
countries as well. Except for places like Iraq, Libya, Serbia that have
been flooded with radioactive waste from artillery munitions, the US is
one of the world’s leaders in the incidence of cancers.
Infrastructure security is worse. It is the US – and
only the US – where bridges are collapsing into rivers, where entire highway
systems are suffering from decades of neglect and must be totally torn out and
rebuilt, but cannot be because the country no longer has any money.
It is the US where dams are failing with frightening
regularity, the last year having more than 1,000 “dam incidents” where a dam
was in imminent danger of failure and collapse American airports,
railways and other infrastructure in America came fifth in a comparison with
Guatemala, Angola, Kirgizstan and Nauru. Where
is the safety in all of this?
Then we had Personal Safety. The Economist told us
that “High levels of police engagement … are instrumental to
security”. Well, not in America, they aren’t. In fact, the higher the
levels of “police engagement” in the US, the more likely you are to be shot
dead. Or strangled. And as to reported crimes, Chicago, Washington DC,
Detroit, are the murder capitals of the world, many of these originating
with the police forces. The entire South Side of Chicago is a place nobody goes
unless they want to be killed, but this city ranks near the top in the
Economist’s list of The World’s Safest Cities. The entire Economist staff must
have been sniffing glue while writing their report.
But even these innovative metrics required adjustment
and tweaking to get any American cities even into the top 5,000 safest places.
The so-called researchers added one indication of their mentality by stating
that “Being statistically safe is not the same as feeling safe”. I cannot
imagine here what these people were thinking.
And this leads us to China, a country renowned for its
low crime rates and very high levels of personal safety. I have travelled through almost every part of
this country, from the largest cities to rural areas, in daylight and darkest
night, alone and with companions, and in 15 years I can honestly say I have
never once had the slightest concern for my personal safety, and in fact the
thought had never entered my mind.
Cities like Shanghai and Beijing lead the world in
personal safety in all respects. But China barely appeared in the entire long list, and mostly only to
the tune of snotty references like “China has a mixed record on the safety of
everything from buildings to rail systems. In 2011, for instance, a high-speed
rail crash in Wenzhou”. The US has hundreds of rail accidents but these rated
no mention. China’s infrastructure is mostly new and well-maintained, health
care is very high quality, the country has no shortage of hospital beds, and
life expectancy is higher than that of the US but rated a zero anyway.
Of course, this report was mocked and ridiculed
mercilessly online by many people, some asking “Where can I order some of what
the “intelligence unit” is smoking?”, while others noted that “Chicago, Los
Angeles and Washington DC. Three murder capitals in the top 20.”
Others simply wrote “What a load of rubbish.”
But we should nevertheless credit the Economist for
doing their best to help their American friends in a time of need. They even
went so far as to encourage Americans by telling them that they really should
feel safer than they do because – based on these foolishly irrelevant metrics –
their cities are safe.
But the people at the Economist did at least have the
good sense to realise that a great many Americans are ignorant enough to
believe what they read, and might act on that belief to their immediate demise.
So at the end of the report: “The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. cannot
accept any responsibility or liability for reliance by any person on this
report or any of the information, opinions or conclusions set out in this
report.” Not hard to understand why.
It may be true that very few people in most Western
countries, but especially in North America, have any understanding of life in a
safe country. Here are three examples, two from my personal experience, the
other related by a friend.
1.
I
was walking down a street in Monte Carlo, chatting with a policeman when, in
front of an expensive apartment building, we saw a Rolls-Royce convertible with
the top down, the keys in the ignition and the engine running, and what looked
like a diamond necklace sitting on the seat. The policeman said he knew the woman
who owned the car and, since we’d been discussing safety, he offered this brief
commentary:
“She has probably gone upstairs to her apartment,
forgotten about her car, and gone to sleep. But when she comes out in the
morning, her car will still be here, the engine still running, and her diamond
necklace will still be on the seat where she left it.”
2.
China
is still in some ways a cash society, having bypassed cheques and cards for
mobile phone payment but surprisingly still using bills for many large
transactions. In any city in China we see on a daily basis people standing in
line at an ATM, patiently waiting while one person is feeding huge wads of
bills into the machine, 10,000 RMB at a time, the pile of cash often exceeding
perhaps $US 50,000. This is such a common transaction as to be completely
ignored by everyone. In any city in North America this is begging for a ‘snatch
and grab’ robbery, but I have never heard of such a thing occurring in China.
2.
An
acquaintance of mine in Tokyo was waiting for a friend at a train station about
100 meters from her office when she remembered some important papers she
needed. Her office would be closed within a few minutes, but the train was also
arriving within a few minutes. What to do? On a bench just outside the train
station exit, she left her bag, knowing her friend would recognise it, and
returned to her office to collect her papers. This was her purse – with her
wallet, passport, money, credit cards. When she returned to the station, her
friend was sitting on the bench beside her bag, waiting for her. Theft
is unknown in Japan, and no parents worry about their children being out
late at night in even the largest cities.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more
than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries,
as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a
retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive
positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international
import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan
University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA
classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of
ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the
contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at https://www.moonofshanghai.com/ and http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
Note
·
https://safecities.economist.com/the-worlds-safest-city
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Moon of Shanghai, Blue Moon of Shanghai, 2021
