God Save the Queen. Or, Maybe not
By Larry Romanoff for PRAVDA, January 14, 2022
Westerners seem to hold a fondness for monarchies;
pleasant remembrances of times past, the pleasures of the "court",
colloquial recollections of quaint beheadings and the capriciousness of
rulings, and envious mention of the 'King's prerogative' on a wedding night.
Altogether a generally uncritical recollection.
We tend to think of the British monarchy today, or
possibly the smaller incarnations existing in Monaco, the Netherlands or
Belgium, rulers who tend now to be not only civilised but also marginalised.
But monarchies were not always thus, and rather too many disappeared in the
smoke of revolutions because entire populations revolted against the frequent
and unpredictable brutality of the rulers, the callous and cynical lack of
concern for the populace, and general bad management.
Monarchies
and Dictatorships
Monarchies and dictatorships are functionally very
similar, differing primarily in the method of succession planning, both being a
form of government where one person holds absolute power, the exercise of which
was not always predictable. Both Monarchies and dictatorships tended to pass
power to the next relative in line. The primary difference between the two is
that monarchies often claimed a 'divine right' to rule, having been
conveniently selected by God, whereas a dictator, sadly but still unashamedly,
passed power onto his son. But the only real difference, certainly in the
public imagination, is that dictators just didn't have the class of monarchs.
There truly is something special about these hard-to-get divine appointments.
But our recollections are little more than us having
what we might call a convenient and selective memory. We recall what we choose.
For downright brutal inhumanity, monarchies have never had much to be proud of.
King Leopold of Belgium killed 10-15 million people without hesitation. A
Transylvanian prince, eager to explain something to his subjects in a way they
could understand, had his soldiers gather 20,000 subjects and chop one arm and
one leg off each one. Monarchies were equally as inhuman as were the worst of
dictators, and the British were arguably the worst of the lot.
The
British Royal Family
In spite of our fond and biased judgments, amply
assisted by exceptional control of the media and the blank pages in our history
books, the British Royal family has been one of the most unconscionably brutal,
inhumane, and greedy broods of gangsters in history, by an order of magnitude.
To say nothing of an astonishing degree of sexual disfunction, also by an order
of magnitude.
Queen Victoria was one of the most zealous gangsters
and murderous imperialists of all time, certainly from the date of her teaming
up with the Rothschilds to loot and massacre the entire nation of India. From
this original intercourse with the Devil’s spawn, the wealth of the British
Royal Family (“The Firm”) soared, and is today rather more than the published
accounts suggest, by as much as several orders of magnitude. Their net worth,
accumulated by means of enormous criminal activity over hundreds of years, is
likely of the order of one trillion dollars or more. It was Victoria who so
heavily supported Rothschild in his massacres of as many (we are told) as 300
million Indians and the wholesale looting of the entire continent, so
thoroughly done as to never have been repeated in history. The 'family' still
has all the jewels.
It was Victoria who gave her consent to the forced
production of opium in India and the use of the British military to enforce its
distribution and use in China, while also sharing in the profits from both
India and China. Victoria (the British Royal Family) not only helped to
engineer and enforce the enormous degradation and destruction of two of the
world's oldest and richest civilisations, but who approved and helped to
engineer what were arguably the greatest acts of cultural genocide in the
history of the world.
It was Victoria who approved the destruction of
China's Summer Palace, the Yuanmingyuan, and the looting of its more than ten
million of the finest and most valuable historical treasures and scholarly
works from 5,000 years of Chinese history, in retaliation for Chinese
resistance to her opium. It was the same woman (the family) who engineered an
even greater crime against the history of Chinese knowledge – the destruction
of the library and the Yongle Dadian at the Hanlin Academy. That encyclopedia
of 22,000 volumes written by more than 2,000 scholars over many years,
contained much of the total of 5,000 years of Chinese knowledge, invention and
thought. It was Queen Victoria's military who carried all those books outdoors,
poured fuel on them, and burnt the entire collection to ashes as punishment for
refusing opium. (1) (2) (3)
It was the British "Royal Family" who used
the power of their military to do all of that, and more. It was the same
"family" who forced China to open its borders wide to opium and
looting, and who forced the relinquishing of Hong Kong so that David Sassoon
could have a distribution base for his opium. And of course, to extract her 10%
(or more) commission from the obscene profits from forcing one nation to forego
food production to grow opium (while dying in the resulting repeated famines)
and to forcibly drug an entire nation to fill her bank account.
Credit image: https://www.grunge.com/194176/the-taiping-rebellion-the-deadliest-civil-war-youve-never-heard-of/
But in some ways, these were almost minor compared
to the human slaughters in which she so actively participated. One of the most
grotesque was China's Taiping Rebellion, where the Taipings had taken control
of much of the geographic area of China and effectively killed the Jewish opium
trade. It was the "British Royal Family" led by Queen Victoria and
assisting Rothschild and Sassoon, who used the British military to train and
lead an army of hundreds of thousands to exterminate the Taipings - the
bloodiest war in the history of the world, with 70 million to 90 million killed
- solely to reinstate the profits from the sale of opium.
It was the same British Royal Family who actively
supported the kidnapping and sale of millions of Chinese, again in support of
the same Jewish families, and who executed the Boer Wars in the most inhuman of
all possible ways, to help Rothschild obtain control of South Africa's gold and
diamond mines. And so much more. This "family" have been murderers,
criminals and gangsters for hundreds of years.
Almost all of this history has been deleted, the
British and the Satanist International Cabal of Gangsters rewriting the history
books so today no one knows any of it. It is not a surprise that the Head
Office of the former British East India company is sealed and locked on a quiet
street with examination of records prohibited and with every effort made to
eliminate its existence from public memory.
But there is much more, perhaps less violent and
gangster-related, but nevertheless astonishing. The "family" have
always been Malthusians, quietly but eagerly supporting the depopulation of the
world. It was Queen Elizabeth's husband, Prince Philip, who boasted to the
world that if he were to be reincarnated, he would want to return as "a
deadly virus", so as to cleanse the world of its humans.
And of course, this essay would not be complete
without at least a mention of the impressive degree of sexual disfunction
resident in such a small brood - perhaps to a degree shared only by their
Satanist friends. The media are today full of tales of Prince Andrew (the
Queen's "favorite son") and his a-bit-too-close relationship with
Jeffrey Epstein and his adolescent sex-trafficking empire, but there is much
more lurking here. As an indication of the broad range of universal values
shared by this "family", Prince Philip, the father (we assume) of
Prince Charles wanted to spend his next life eliminating mankind, but his son
had a very different ambition. Prince Charles, (the man who will never be King
because his mother hates him and will literally die before she relinquishes the
throne to him), was secretly recorded in a then-leaked conversation with his
mistress saying he would like to be reincarnated as a tampon so he could spend
his entire next life in his girlfriend's vagina. What else is there to say? (4)
Just so you know, "democracies" are not
better in any respect than monarchies or dictatorships. There is no substantial
difference between the British Royal Family and any administration of the US
government, toward any portion of humanity, neither in attitude nor
methodology, nor in the lust for power and profit. The Western world truly
needs a wide series of popular revolutions. The mess somehow needs to be
cleaned up or humanity is doomed.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his
articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in
more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms.
Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held
senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an
international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at
Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs
to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing
a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the
contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/ and https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
Notes
(1) China Remembers a Vast Crime – The New York
Times; https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/22/arts/22iht-MELVIN.html
(2) Peking’s Summer Palace destroyed; https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/pekings-summer-palace-destroyed
(3) “The Destruction of a Great Library: China’s
Loss Belongs to the World; https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ552559
Copyright
© Larry Romanoff, Moon of Shanghai, Blue Moon of Shanghai,
2022
